Re: [DOCS] Site Administrators Gendered

should fix the number agreement problem with the replacement. Make site administrator plural. > > > -- > Álvaro Herrerahttps://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ > PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-docs ma

Re: [DOCS] A user report of misinterpretation of 'unsupported versions'

As we move towards 9.4, would it be worthwhile suggesting that we break this out into "Obsolete Versions" and "Forthcoming" or similar? -- Best Wishes, Chris Travers Efficito: Hosted Accounting and ERP. Robust and Flexible. No vendor lock-in. http://www.efficito.com/learn_more.shtml

Re: [DOCS] Thoughts on inheritance docs

On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 7:09 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Chris Travers writes: >> 1) Would it be worth coming up with more useful examples for table >> inheritance? >> 2) Would it be worth adding mention of uses of multiple table inheritance? >> 3) Would it be worth dis

[DOCS] Thoughts on inheritance docs

s of table inheritance? I personally recognize the difficulties in documenting these but I can't help thinking that a simple chart of "this is/is not inherited" would be very useful as well. What do people think? Best Wishes, Chris Travers -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-doc

Re: [DOCS] Would like to contribute a section to docs for 9.3. Where to start?

, Chris Travers

Re: [DOCS] Would like to contribute a section to docs for 9.3. Where to start?

On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Jeff Davis wrote: > On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 16:03 -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > On 8/15/12 5:33 AM, Chris Travers wrote: > > > So here is a very rough draft. I would be interested in feedback as to > > > inaccuracies or omission

Re: [DOCS] Would like to contribute a section to docs for 9.3. Where to start?

On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 8/15/12 5:33 AM, Chris Travers wrote: > >> So here is a very rough draft. I would be interested in feedback as to >> inaccuracies or omissions. I would like to get the technical side right >> before going

Re: [DOCS] Would like to contribute a section to docs for 9.3. Where to start?

So here is a very rough draft. I would be interested in feedback as to inaccuracies or omissions. I would like to get the technical side right before going into an editorial phase. Any feedback on the technical side? Best Wishes, Chris Travers How is PostgreSQL "Object-Relational?"

Re: [DOCS] Would like to contribute a section to docs for 9.3. Where to start?

found that inherited relations do not inherit casts. Is this intentional? Is there a reason I should be putting into the documentation? Or is it just a gotcha that should be listed as a caveat? Best Wishes, Chris Travers

Re: [DOCS] Would like to contribute a section to docs for 9.3. Where to start?

On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 7:41 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Chris Travers writes: > > I would like to contribute a "What is an Object Relational database?" > > section to the documentation for 9.3. Where is the best place to start > > tools and community-process-wise?

[DOCS] Would like to contribute a section to docs for 9.3. Where to start?

be seen as misfeatures, such as class.function syntax although this could be useful in the case of simulating calculated fields. What do people think there? Is this a feature or a misfeature? Best Wishes, Chris Travers