(I suspect -Xms
isn't needed).
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
on subject and look for any constructive opinions.
> Thanks!
>
> --
> Best regards,
> J.F.
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list (pgadmin-hack...@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers
;s the
> best place to get a website, a wiki, and a mailing list these days?
> sourceforge?
I'll be moving it to git.postgresql.org in the not-to-distant future.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterpri
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 9:11 PM, Andy Lester wrote:
>
> On Mar 29, 2012, at 1:10 PM, Dave Page wrote:
>
> The docs pages are rendered using the Django template here:
>
>
> That's a start. Thanks.
>
> When I have questions about infrastructure, can I ask you for
c357
by the backend code here:
http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=pgweb.git;a=tree;f=pgweb/docs;h=c227a13f0a87dd5707abf5f11af0e6248621e984;hb=5d3a6f7a38670e522e2d33725476e525f9f2c357
(views.py is the place to look).
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB
ogle will usually find the
> documentation of some old version. A search on Bing, however, doesn't
> find the documentation at all. That indicates to me that there is
> something seriously wrong in how the web site is constructed.
Works for me. Aside from the version issue, I g
ntence as:
>>
>> If a single PostgreSQL server instance is to house projects or users
>> that should be separate (for the most part unaware of each other), we
>> recommend storing them in separate databases.
>
> Except that we don't use the first person in docs, do we
eous to me. I ran it past one of our tech writers (Susan
Douglas), who rewrote the sentence as:
If a single PostgreSQL server instance is to house projects or users
that should be separate (for the most part unaware of each other), we
recommend storing them in separate databases.
--
Dave Page
run into that and had it cause delays when I've been building
release installers before now (sourceforge were having issues iirc) -
not good.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--
Sent
, presumably that'll
become more and more of a pain, as distros update to 5.x, requiring
users to start building manually, and having to deal with parallel
installations of two versions.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
nd "are detailed" instead of "was and were"
>
> I am pretty sure these books still exist.
It seems fine to me. The tense refers to when it was written, not when
the papers were available (or not).
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
Enterpr
t;> 8.3 and 8.4:
>>
>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/manuals/
>>
>> Also, one of our users has created one for 9.0.2:
>>
>> http://char-docs.googlecode.com/files/PostgreSQL-9.0.2.chm
>>
>> Should we add a link to this and get it
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 9:04 PM, Thom Brown wrote:
> On 7 September 2010 20:58, Dave Page wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 8:48 PM, Thom Brown wrote:
>>> On 7 September 2010 20:28, Dave Page wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 7:47 PM, Thom Brown wrote:
>&g
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 8:48 PM, Thom Brown wrote:
> On 7 September 2010 20:28, Dave Page wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 7:47 PM, Thom Brown wrote:
>>> Sorry, I should have clarified. There are boxes containing notes
>>> which I had originally coloured yellow, bu
.4/static/release-8-4.html,
theres a new underline on "E.5.1. Overview" for example.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
--
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgre
xes should be fixed though - that's
a potential accessibility issue due to the lack of contrast.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
--
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgr
e railroad design come when there are lots of
> references to other diagrams, and you end up with about 10 just for 1
> statement.
>
> Is there a way of testing their usefulness?
Personal experience? I used to find them quite useful when I was
starting out with Informix.
--
Da
port this:
>
> /usr/lib64/postgresql-9.0/bin/pg_upgrade: invalid option -- 'f'
>
> The only options available are:
>
> Are those instructions for an older version?
>
That's Bruce's book which is probably 8 or 9 years old now. It's
almost certainly refe
hed: + echo -n '' + date -u '+%Y-%m-%d %H:%M %Z'
>
> No changes in this build
>
> Build completed successfully.
>
> View or download the documentation.
>
> even though somebody committed broken markup half an hour ago.
Iirc, that'
t; And we're not likely to release 9.0 before then :(
In that case, it should be >= 8.1.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PG East Conference: http://www.enterprisedb.com/community/nav-pg-east-2010.do
--
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postg
On 8/15/09, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On lör, 2009-08-15 at 09:53 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 10:34 PM, Stefan
>> Kaltenbrunner wrote:
>> >> His complaint is that we're now depending on a random website to be up
>> >> and reacha
the doc builds depend on the availabilty of some random
> external website is fairly problematic and feels really wrong(and not an
> improvement in general at all)
Hasn't this always been the case? When building the installers, I
occasionally have 'make html' fail because
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 7:01 PM, Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dave Page wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 8:37 AM, Nikolay Samokhvalov
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 11:30 AM, Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTE
o yet.
>
> What about using UTF8 for Russian text? Why not simply "iconv -f
> koi8-r -t utf8 ..."?
I thought that was what Bruce was going to do. He has other priorities
at the moment though, so perhaps one of the the committers could
handle it.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: h
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S-6cIy_s8pQ&feature=related
Now that just sounds plain weird without the voiceover guy that does
the Discovery UK edits!
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK Ltd: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL UK 2008 Conference: http://www.postgresql.org.uk
--
Sent v
On Jan 31, 2008 5:35 PM, Joshua D. Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 12:29:05 -0500
> Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Can't speak to Slackware or Irix, but IMHO Fedora and HP/UX deserve to
>
> I know of at least one
On Jan 30, 2008 11:15 AM, Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The supported platforms list in the installation instructions is completely
> un-updated for 8.3. Is this list still useful? What shall we do with it?
I think it's important to keep in the docs so people know what we've
test
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Dave Page wrote:
>> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>> Dave Page wrote:
>
>>>>> Personally, I believe we should only talk about the "latest" release on
>>>>> the front page and have "older releases" linked
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Dave Page wrote:
>> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>> Dave Page wrote:
>>>> There is currently no way for a visitor to the website to what whats
>>>> cool and new in the latest major release. This info is in the main
>>>> a
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Dave Page wrote:
>> There is currently no way for a visitor to the website to what whats
>> cool and new in the latest major release. This info is in the main
>> announcement panel for a while after we release, but is gone as soon as
>> we hav
There is currently no way for a visitor to the website to what whats
cool and new in the latest major release. This info is in the main
announcement panel for a while after we release, but is gone as soon as
we have a conference or something.
Any ideas how we can best fix this?
Related to this,
Magnus Hagander wrote:
I'm bouncing this over to -www as well to hear what people think about
that part. If we do that, I'd definitely like to see a proper page and
not just a FAQ link.
Agreed, though there's no reason not to have both. Including it on the
main site will add an air of legitima
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruce Momjian
> Sent: 15 November 2005 14:04
> To: Alvaro Herrera
> Cc: Tom Lane; Kris Jurka; David Fetter;
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [DOCS] [pgsql-www] 8.1 PDF D
Done.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Bruce Momjian
Sent: Thu 10/13/2005 10:08 PM
To: Alvaro Herrera
Cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Marc G. Fournier
Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] [DOCS] Typo in README.dist-split
For clarity, the last line should be
In order to build the docs for the Windows distribution of PostgreSQL
and all platforms supported bt pgAdmin, I need to run 'make htmlhelp'
from doc/src/sgml, which generates html doc pages and htmlhelp indexes,
project file and toc.
Unfortunately this generally seems to fail on the xsltproc step
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alvaro Herrera
> Sent: 29 August 2005 23:41
> To: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [pgsql-www] Typo in README.dist-split
>
> Not sure what mailing list should I be sendin
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alexey Borzov
> Sent: 20 January 2005 21:29
> To: Magnus Hagander
> Cc: Tom Lane; Mike Blackwell; pgsql-docs@postgresql.org;
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] [DOCS] [BUGS] BUG #1414: D
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruce Momjian
> Sent: 01 December 2004 17:54
> To: Magnus Hagander
> Cc: Ian Barwick; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; PostgreSQL www
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] [DOCS] FAQ and Windows
>
> OK, we will need one of
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alvaro Herrera
> Sent: 28 June 2004 04:08
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [pgsql-www] Bug in docs www
>
> The web version of the release notes in the docs for the 7.4
> b
> -Original Message-
> From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 20 April 2004 02:04
> To: Tom Lane
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Odd formatting in on-line docs
>
> Someone must have fixed it:
>
> SELECT * FROM MY_TABLE;
> UPDATE MY_
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 17 April 2004 17:56
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [pgsql-www] Odd formatting in on-line docs
>
> I think this must be some weird interaction between the docs
> themselves and the HTML wrapp
> -Original Message-
> From: Josh Berkus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 20 November 2003 17:49
> To: Roberto Mello; Bruce Momjian
> Cc: Michael Glaesemann; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] [DOCS] 7.4 official docs : Fonts?
>
> Yeah. In Kate (with t
> -Original Message-
> From: Darko Prenosil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 13 September 2003 22:28
> To: Dave Page; Bruce Momjian; Andreas Pflug
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; PostgreSQL Win32 port list
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] [DOCS] Windows CHM format
&
> -Original Message-
> From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 13 September 2003 18:05
> To: Andreas Pflug
> Cc: Dave Page; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; PostgreSQL Win32 port list
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] [DOCS] Windows CHM format
&
> -Original Message-
> From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 08 September 2003 04:00
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; PostgreSQL Win32 port list
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] [DOCS] Windows CHM format
> for the documents
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] w
> -Original Message-
> From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 03 September 2003 21:29
> To: Ian Barwick
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; PostgreSQL www
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] [DOCS] German FAQ update
>
>
> Ian Barwick wrote:
> > attached.
> >
> > BTW the FAQs on the website
46 matches
Mail list logo
