Le 18/04/2012 22:14, Tom Lane a écrit :
> "Kevin Grittner" writes:
>> I guess the point is that for hundreds of years, the same day could
>> have a different date depending which country's calendar you were
>> looking at. I'm not entirely clear why there's a problem if you
>> pick the Gregorian c
.
This sentence seemed very strange to me, and I am not sure to really
understand what it implies (or not) for the user. Could someone explain
that this really means and implies?
Thank you,
Florence Cousin.
--
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your
Le mardi 15 juin 2010 22:04:06, Bruce Momjian a écrit :
>
> Wow, that is a confusing double-negative sentence. I have updated the
> text to be:
>
> In addition, rows that satisfied the query conditions as of the
> query snapshot will be locked, although they will not be returned
> if
Hi,
I am one of the french translators of the documentation. I am translating the
reference page of SELECT, but I fail to understand this sentence about the FOR
UPDATE clause ( http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/sql-
select.html#SQL-FOR-UPDATE-SHARE )
---
In addition, row
