Bruce Momjian writes:
Well, I assumed "Londiste" head reached the level that we should mention
it, but you are right on the floodgates issue. We do aleady mention
many other replication solutions in other sections, so I didn't think
Then perhaps all that is needed is to just link to the repli
Robert Haas writes:
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 7:52 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Can anyone suggest where a "Londiste" mention would fit in our high
availability docs?
http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/high-availability.html
I would think wherever we mention Slony - I gather t
Bruce Momjian writes:
Can anyone suggest where a "Londiste" mention would fit in our high
availability docs?
I would suggest a new category.
25.1 (Comparison of different solutions) lists this one type of solution
"Trigger-Based Master-Slave Replication".
Perhaps a category for Trigger-Base
On 10:45 am 07/22/08 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [ redirecting to pgsql-docs ]
> number-of-buffers. I agree it's not entirely obvious that what it
> means is "multiply your setting in KB/MB by 8400/8192". Anybody have
> an idea how to clarify things?
Perhaps changing the table title?
