On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 01:40 am, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> I am wondering we should make this warning more prominent - it would be
> easily missed buried on the Oracle porting section, and I have seen
> people caught by it lots of times.
I added it to the Oracle section because I found this syntax whil
Hi, I supplied a minor doco patch relating to porting pl/SQL to pl/pgSQL:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-10/msg01295.php. Also
attached here.
Could someone please review and apply this for me?
Regards, Philip.
--
"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first
t; too.
>
> I figured everyone would assume that. I know of no language that will
> execute a loop listed as 10 ... 1.
Basic on my first computer suppported it, though the syntax was
FOR $i in 10 TO 1 STEP -1
PRINT $i
NEXT
I think it is worth stating explicitly
