> What exactly is the point of the change at all?
Take a typical line in the table:
Error Code | Meaning
23502 | NOT NULL VIOLATION
Now assume I want to catch this exception in a plpgsql function:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION foo()
/* boilerplate omitted */
EXCEPTION
WHEN NOT_NULL_VIOLA
d Tom, I think that would lend
weight to allowing PostgreSQL to do it too (not because it's The Right Thing,
but for interoperability and ease of porting). Thoughts?
Regards, Philip.
--
"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code
Hi, I supplied a minor doco patch relating to porting pl/SQL to pl/pgSQL:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-10/msg01295.php. Also
attached here.
Could someone please review and apply this for me?
Regards, Philip.
--
"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code i
Thanks for the pointers - I'll talk to pgsql-www if I have any more questions.
Yours,
Philip
pgpq76i1HiYSJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
echnical side of the system?
Is the source code available?
Thanks in advance,
Philip
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
t; too.
>
> I figured everyone would assume that. I know of no language that will
> execute a loop listed as 10 ... 1.
Basic on my first computer suppported it, though the syntax was
FOR $i in 10 TO 1 STEP -1
PRINT $i
NEXT
I think it is worth stating explicitly