Re: [DOCS] ALTER TABLE ... CLUSTER ON synopsis

2012-08-30 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 12:22:22AM -0700, Josh Kupershmidt wrote: > On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 9:09 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > > > The main inconsistency I notice on that page is that some of the > > subform descriptions repeat the whole syntax while others only show > > the initial keyword(s).  Should w

Re: [DOCS] ALTER TABLE ... CLUSTER ON synopsis

2012-05-22 Thread Josh Kupershmidt
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 9:09 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > The main inconsistency I notice on that page is that some of the > subform descriptions repeat the whole syntax while others only show > the initial keyword(s).  Should we try to be more consistent about > that, and if so, in which direction? We

Re: [DOCS] ALTER TABLE ... CLUSTER ON synopsis

2012-05-21 Thread Tom Lane
Josh Kupershmidt writes: > The reference page for ALTER TABLE[1] correctly has the synopsis: > CLUSTER ON index_name > but later leaves off the "ON" keyword: > CLUSTER > I think the latter description should match the former, especially > since 'ON' is mandatory; small patch attached.

[DOCS] ALTER TABLE ... CLUSTER ON synopsis

2012-05-20 Thread Josh Kupershmidt
Hi all, The reference page for ALTER TABLE[1] correctly has the synopsis: CLUSTER ON index_name but later leaves off the "ON" keyword: CLUSTER I think the latter description should match the former, especially since 'ON' is mandatory; small patch attached. Josh [1] http://www.postgre