Bruce Momjian writes:
> Did unnest() get added properly too?
Yes, I included it in the patch.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
Mario Splivalo wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Mario Splivalo writes:
> >> Hope this is ok. How can I submit patch for 8.3 documentation?
> >
> > I think you just did. Applied, thanks.
>
> I pulled the source from CVS HEAD branch, I see that is 8.4
> documentation (for instance, 'cardinality' fun
Tom Lane wrote:
Mario Splivalo writes:
Hope this is ok. How can I submit patch for 8.3 documentation?
I think you just did. Applied, thanks.
I pulled the source from CVS HEAD branch, I see that is 8.4
documentation (for instance, 'cardinality' function is nonexistant for 8.3).
PS: why'
Mario Splivalo writes:
> Hope this is ok. How can I submit patch for 8.3 documentation?
I think you just did. Applied, thanks.
regards, tom lane
PS: why'd you omit unnest()?
--
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscr
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Mario Splivalo wrote:
>> None of the array functions
>> (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/interactive/functions-array.html)
>> are mentioned in the documentation index. Is that intentional?
>> I thought it would be 'handy' to have those functions referenced in index.
>
>
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Mario Splivalo wrote:
None of the array functions
(http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/interactive/functions-array.html)
are mentioned in the documentation index. Is that intentional?
I thought it would be 'handy' to have those functions referenced in index.
Agreed -- plea
Mario Splivalo wrote:
> None of the array functions
> (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/interactive/functions-array.html)
> are mentioned in the documentation index. Is that intentional?
> I thought it would be 'handy' to have those functions referenced in index.
Agreed -- please submit a patch.
None of the array functions
(http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/interactive/functions-array.html)
are mentioned in the documentation index. Is that intentional?
I thought it would be 'handy' to have those functions referenced in index.
Mike
--
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs