On Tue, 2007-15-05 at 09:07 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I agree, the note should be added there (but it should be a short one
> and refer the reader someplace else for more complete details).
I've applied the attached patch to HEAD and REL8_2_STABLE.
-Neil
Index: doc/src/sgml/config.sgml
Neil Conway wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-14-05 at 16:22 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I agree with Tom. I don't think the current behavior is a major issue
> > for users for it to be mentioned more than it already is
>
> Are you really suggesting that we shouldn't modify config.sgml to note
> that "au
On Mon, 2007-14-05 at 16:22 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I agree with Tom. I don't think the current behavior is a major issue
> for users for it to be mentioned more than it already is
Are you really suggesting that we shouldn't modify config.sgml to note
that "autovacuum = off" does not actual
David Fetter wrote:
> On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 10:06:40PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Per Neil Conway, here's some doc patches re: the autovacuum
> > > daemon's behavior. Should this be back-patched to 8.2x?
> >
> > This fact is already documented in a
On Sun, 2007-13-05 at 22:06 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> This fact is already documented in at least three places; do we really
> need two more?
I think we need to at least modify the documentation for the autovacuum
GUC parameter, which currently states only that it "controls whether the
server shoul
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 10:06:40PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Per Neil Conway, here's some doc patches re: the autovacuum
> > daemon's behavior. Should this be back-patched to 8.2x?
>
> This fact is already documented in at least three places; do we
> re
David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Per Neil Conway, here's some doc patches re: the autovacuum daemon's
> behavior. Should this be back-patched to 8.2x?
This fact is already documented in at least three places; do we really
need two more? The proposed addition to postgresql.conf seems
pa
Folks,
Per Neil Conway, here's some doc patches re: the autovacuum daemon's
behavior. Should this be back-patched to 8.2x?
Cheers,
D
--
David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 415 235 3778AIM: dfetter666
Skype: davidfetter
Remember to