Re: [DOCS] Building PDF documentation

2010-01-22 Thread Bruce Momjian
Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On fre, 2010-01-22 at 12:12 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > > Bruce Momjian writes: > > > Wow, that is odd then. I pulled down a new copy of CVS, ran configure, > > > and got the same result: > > > > > $ gmake postgres.pdf > > > Makefile:172: *** Invalid target; use postg

Re: [DOCS] Building PDF documentation

2010-01-22 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On fre, 2010-01-22 at 12:12 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian writes: > > Wow, that is odd then. I pulled down a new copy of CVS, ran configure, > > and got the same result: > > > $ gmake postgres.pdf > > Makefile:172: *** Invalid target; use postgres-A4.pdf or > > postgres-US.

Re: [DOCS] Building PDF documentation

2010-01-22 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian writes: > Wow, that is odd then. I pulled down a new copy of CVS, ran configure, > and got the same result: > $ gmake postgres.pdf > Makefile:172: *** Invalid target; use postgres-A4.pdf or > postgres-US.pdf as targets. Stop. > $ gmake postgres-A4.pdf >

Re: [DOCS] Building PDF documentation

2010-01-22 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> Really? It seems to work for me without that. What do you observe > >> to go wrong? > > > $ gmake postgres-A4.pdf > > gmake: *** No rule to make target `postgres-A4.pdf'. Stop. > > Works for me ... sure you've got a clea

Re: [DOCS] Building PDF documentation

2010-01-22 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Really? It seems to work for me without that. What do you observe >> to go wrong? > $ gmake postgres-A4.pdf > gmake: *** No rule to make target `postgres-A4.pdf'. Stop. Works for me ... sure you've got a clean copy of the makefile?

Re: [DOCS] Building PDF documentation

2010-01-22 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian writes: > > I have determined that the HTML documentation must be built before any > > of the PDF makefile targets are valid, so I have applied the attached > > documentation patch to mention this. > > Really? It seems to work for me without that. What do you obs

Re: [DOCS] Building PDF documentation

2010-01-22 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian writes: > I have determined that the HTML documentation must be built before any > of the PDF makefile targets are valid, so I have applied the attached > documentation patch to mention this. Really? It seems to work for me without that. What do you observe to go wrong?

[DOCS] Building PDF documentation

2010-01-22 Thread Bruce Momjian
I have determined that the HTML documentation must be built before any of the PDF makefile targets are valid, so I have applied the attached documentation patch to mention this. -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + I