On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Alvaro Herrera
wrote:
> Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of jue sep 23 15:08:31 -0400 2010:
>> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Alvaro Herrera
>> wrote:
>> > Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of jue sep 23 09:38:32 -0400 2010:
>> >
>> >> Oh, huh. So are thos
Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of jue sep 23 15:08:31 -0400 2010:
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> wrote:
> > Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of jue sep 23 09:38:32 -0400 2010:
> >
> >> Oh, huh. So are those leftover strings that aren't used any more, or what?
> >>
> >
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Alvaro Herrera
wrote:
> Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of jue sep 23 09:38:32 -0400 2010:
>
>> Oh, huh. So are those leftover strings that aren't used any more, or what?
>>
>> [rhaas pgsql]$ git grep -l PL/PgSQL
>> src/pl/plpgsql/src/po/fr.po
>> src/pl/plpgsq
Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of jue sep 23 09:38:32 -0400 2010:
> Oh, huh. So are those leftover strings that aren't used any more, or what?
>
> [rhaas pgsql]$ git grep -l PL/PgSQL
> src/pl/plpgsql/src/po/fr.po
> src/pl/plpgsql/src/po/it.po
> src/pl/plpgsql/src/po/ja.po
> src/pl/plpgsql/s
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 8:09 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On ons, 2010-09-22 at 22:00 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> Not back-patching, so as to avoid creating unnecessary work
>> for translators.
>
> Probably not worth backpatching anyway ... but the patch doesn't
> actually touch anything transla
On ons, 2010-09-22 at 22:00 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> Not back-patching, so as to avoid creating unnecessary work
> for translators.
Probably not worth backpatching anyway ... but the patch doesn't
actually touch anything translatable.
--
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresq
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 9:41 PM, Josh Kupershmidt wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 9:06 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> Josh Kupershmidt wrote:
>>> I always assumed "PL/pgSQL" was correct, but does anyone know for
>>> sure? Anyone interested in making consistent all these mentions of
>>> PL/pgSQL in
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 9:06 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Josh Kupershmidt wrote:
>> I always assumed "PL/pgSQL" was correct, but does anyone know for
>> sure? Anyone interested in making consistent all these mentions of
>> PL/pgSQL in the source (I can send in a patch if needed)?
>
> Sure, it shoul
Josh Kupershmidt wrote:
> I happened to notice this while reading the 9.0 release notes. Most
> places, "PL/pgSQL" is capitalized (correctly?) like so:
> $ find postgresql/ | xargs grep "PL/pgSQL" | wc -l
> 476
>
> But I also see a decent number of references to this alternate capitalizatio
I happened to notice this while reading the 9.0 release notes. Most
places, "PL/pgSQL" is capitalized (correctly?) like so:
$ find postgresql/ | xargs grep "PL/pgSQL" | wc -l
476
But I also see a decent number of references to this alternate capitalization:
$ find postgresql/ | xargs grep
10 matches
Mail list logo