Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> > On 3/2/11 8:35 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> >> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> >>> Had to look up some stuff given the splintering of Solaris:
> >>>
> >>> ==
> >>>
> >>> Solaris 2.6 to 2.9
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 3/2/11 8:35 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
>>> Had to look up some stuff given the splintering of Solaris:
>>>
>>> ==
>>>
>>> Solaris 2.6 to 2.9 (Solaris 6 to Solaris 9)
>>>
>>>
On 3/2/11 8:35 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
>> Had to look up some stuff given the splintering of Solaris:
>>
>> ==
>>
>> Solaris 2.6 to 2.9 (Solaris 6 to Solaris 9)
>>
>>The default maximum size of a shared memory segment is too l
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Had to look up some stuff given the splintering of Solaris:
>
> ==
>
> Solaris 2.6 to 2.9 (Solaris 6 to Solaris 9)
>
> The default maximum size of a shared memory segment is too low for
> PostgreSQL. The relevant settings can
Bruce,
Had to look up some stuff given the splintering of Solaris:
==
Solaris 2.6 to 2.9 (Solaris 6 to Solaris 9)
The default maximum size of a shared memory segment is too low for
PostgreSQL. The relevant settings can be changed in /etc/system, for
example:
set shmsys:
Having received no replies to my request for an updated doc, I am going
to let the issue drop.
---
Josh Berkus wrote:
> All,
>
> Our Solaris section is out of date. We should change it to:
>
> ===
>
> Sol
Josh, can I get a correct, updated version of this so I can add it to
our documentation?
---
Josh Berkus wrote:
> All,
>
> Our Solaris section is out of date. We should change it to:
>
> ===
>
> Solaris 2
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 10:36 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Josh Berkus wrote:
>> On 5/11/10 3:06 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> > On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
>> >> The above assumes that there isn't already a project
>> >> 101,
>> >
>> > I must be missing something, because I don
Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 5/11/10 3:06 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> > On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> >> The above assumes that there isn't already a project
> >> 101,
> >
> > I must be missing something, because I don't see the reference to 101.
>
> Editing error. I see another
On 5/11/10 3:06 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
>> The above assumes that there isn't already a project
>> 101,
>
> I must be missing something, because I don't see the reference to 101.
Editing error. I see another, moment for a new version.
--
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> The above assumes that there isn't already a project
> 101,
I must be missing something, because I don't see the reference to 101.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
--
Sent via pgsql-d
All,
Our Solaris section is out of date. We should change it to:
===
Solaris 2.6 to 2.9 (Solaris 6 to Solaris 9)
The default maximum size of a shared memory segment is too low for
PostgreSQL. The relevant settings can be changed in /etc/system, for
example:
set shmsys:
12 matches
Mail list logo