On 2 November 2015 at 21:05, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> On Sunday, November 1, 2015 7:59 PM, Craig Ringer
> wrote:
>
>> The explicit locking docs mention the lock taken by REFRESH
>> MATERIALIZED VIEW CONCURRENTLY, but not plain REFRESH MATERIALIZED
>> VIEW. Patch.
>
> Pushed, with minor adjustment
On Sunday, November 1, 2015 7:59 PM, Craig Ringer wrote:
> The explicit locking docs mention the lock taken by REFRESH
> MATERIALIZED VIEW CONCURRENTLY, but not plain REFRESH MATERIALIZED
> VIEW. Patch.
Pushed, with minor adjustment.
--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterp
The explicit locking docs mention the lock taken by REFRESH
MATERIALIZED VIEW CONCURRENTLY, but not plain REFRESH MATERIALIZED
VIEW. Patch.
--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From d24f44836b6f7358fcea5c7d2aebf8