Florence Cousin wrote:
> Le mardi 15 juin 2010 22:04:06, Bruce Momjian a ?crit :
> >
> > Wow, that is a confusing double-negative sentence. I have updated the
> > text to be:
> >
> > In addition, rows that satisfied the query conditions as of the
> > query snapshot will be locked, althou
Le mardi 15 juin 2010 22:04:06, Bruce Momjian a écrit :
>
> Wow, that is a confusing double-negative sentence. I have updated the
> text to be:
>
> In addition, rows that satisfied the query conditions as of the
> query snapshot will be locked, although they will not be returned
> if
Florence Cousin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am one of the french translators of the documentation. I am translating the
>
> reference page of SELECT, but I fail to understand this sentence about the
> FOR
> UPDATE clause ( http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/sql-
> select.html#SQL-FOR-UPDATE-SH
Hi,
I am one of the french translators of the documentation. I am translating the
reference page of SELECT, but I fail to understand this sentence about the FOR
UPDATE clause ( http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/sql-
select.html#SQL-FOR-UPDATE-SHARE )
---
In addition, row
