Re: [DOCS] Int32 type unclear about signedness

2017-09-01 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 8/23/17 14:45, r...@paranoia.at wrote: > Both its C-like name and its use for negative values in several protocol 3 > messages make assuming signedness only reasonable. Yet, when used for > message lengths, the libpq code seems unclear: > > The libpq frontend reads message lengths from the back

[DOCS] Int32 type unclear about signedness

2017-08-23 Thread rsto
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/protocol-message-types.html Description: The specification of the Int32 Message data type in section 51.4 of the current documentation does to specify signedness (see [1]). Both i