Re: [DOCS] Observation on integer types documentation

2012-08-30 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 06:38:47PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > I have developed the attached patch based on your observations. Applied. --- > > On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 03:59:20PM -0500, Dan McGee wrote: > > Hey everyon

Re: [DOCS] Observation on integer types documentation

2012-08-29 Thread Bruce Momjian
I have developed the attached patch based on your observations. --- On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 03:59:20PM -0500, Dan McGee wrote: > Hey everyone, > > Reading the docs today, I came across this paragraph > (http://www.postgresq

Re: [DOCS] Observation on integer types documentation

2012-05-21 Thread Dan McGee
Yes, I didn't see any difference in query plans between the two. -Dan On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Marcelo Sena wrote: > I'm new here but your proposal makes sense to me. Are the query plans equal > on both architectures? > > -- > Marcelo Lacerda > > > On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Dan Mc

Re: [DOCS] Observation on integer types documentation

2012-05-13 Thread Marcelo Sena
I'm new here but your proposal makes sense to me. Are the query plans equal on both architectures? -- Marcelo Lacerda On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Dan McGee wrote: > Hey everyone, > > Reading the docs today, I came across this paragraph > ( > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/dat

[DOCS] Observation on integer types documentation

2012-04-30 Thread Dan McGee
Hey everyone, Reading the docs today, I came across this paragraph (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/datatype-numeric.html#DATATYPE-INT), which goes back several major versions: > The type integer is the common choice, as it offers the best balance between > range, storage size, and p