On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 06:38:47PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> I have developed the attached patch based on your observations.
Applied.
---
>
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 03:59:20PM -0500, Dan McGee wrote:
> > Hey everyon
I have developed the attached patch based on your observations.
---
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 03:59:20PM -0500, Dan McGee wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> Reading the docs today, I came across this paragraph
> (http://www.postgresq
Yes, I didn't see any difference in query plans between the two.
-Dan
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Marcelo Sena wrote:
> I'm new here but your proposal makes sense to me. Are the query plans equal
> on both architectures?
>
> --
> Marcelo Lacerda
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Dan Mc
I'm new here but your proposal makes sense to me. Are the query plans equal
on both architectures?
--
Marcelo Lacerda
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Dan McGee wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> Reading the docs today, I came across this paragraph
> (
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/dat
Hey everyone,
Reading the docs today, I came across this paragraph
(http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/datatype-numeric.html#DATATYPE-INT),
which goes back several major versions:
> The type integer is the common choice, as it offers the best balance between
> range, storage size, and p