Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] [DOCS] Online backup vs Continuous backup

2006-03-03 Thread Bruce Momjian
Applied. --- Bruce Momjian wrote: > Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > I used your suggestion and renamed "online backup" to "incremental > > > backup", and added a mention that many database vendors call

Re: [HACKERS] [DOCS] Online backup vs Continuous backup

2006-03-02 Thread Bruce Momjian
Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > I used your suggestion and renamed "online backup" to "incremental > > backup", and added a mention that many database vendors call it > > "online backup". > > Consistency would then demand that the other two be renamed to "full > backup". I thi

Re: [HACKERS] [DOCS] Online backup vs Continuous backup

2006-02-13 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Bruce Momjian wrote: > I used your suggestion and renamed "online backup" to "incremental > backup", and added a mention that many database vendors call it > "online backup". Consistency would then demand that the other two be renamed to "full backup". I think we had better suggestions earlier.

Re: [HACKERS] [DOCS] Online backup vs Continuous backup

2006-02-13 Thread Bruce Momjian
I used your suggestion and renamed "online backup" to "incremental backup", and added a mention that many database vendors call it "online backup". Patch attached. --- Rick Gigger wrote: > How about: > > use "Online backup

Re: [DOCS] Online backup vs Continuous backup

2005-12-30 Thread Christopher Browne
> Bruce Momjian writes: >> I suggest the following patch to rename our capability "Continuous >> Backup". > > This doesn't seem like an improvement. "Online backup" is the standard > terminology AFAIK. There's something ambiguous about it, in view that there are two useful points in time for a b

Re: [HACKERS] [DOCS] Online backup vs Continuous backup

2005-12-30 Thread Simon Riggs
On Mon, 2005-12-26 at 13:46 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > Bruce Momjian writes: > > > I suggest the following patch to rename our capability "Continuous > > > Backup". > > > > This doesn't seem like an improvement. "Online backup" is the standard > > terminology AFAIK. > > B

Re: [DOCS] Online backup vs Continuous backup

2005-12-26 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian writes: > > I suggest the following patch to rename our capability "Continuous > > Backup". > > This doesn't seem like an improvement. "Online backup" is the standard > terminology AFAIK. But why is it the standard terminology? It doesn't seem logical. -- Br

Re: [DOCS] Online backup vs Continuous backup

2005-12-26 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian writes: > I suggest the following patch to rename our capability "Continuous > Backup". This doesn't seem like an improvement. "Online backup" is the standard terminology AFAIK. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)---

[DOCS] Online backup vs Continuous backup

2005-12-26 Thread Bruce Momjian
I noticed that we are using the term "Online Backup" in our documentation when we are talking about continuous backup and PITR. To me, "online backup" is doing a backup while the system is online (online-backup), and that is accomplished by pg_dump. I know a lot of databases us "Online Backup" bu