Bruce Momjian a écrit :
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>[...]
>> The point of "any datatype they can return a single instance of" is that
>> this can be a set of scalar values (e.g. "RETURNS SETOF int") or of a
>> complex type ("RETURNS SETOF table"), or anything else they can return a
>> single instance
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > --- 132,142
> >
> >
> >
> > ! PL/pgSQL functions can also be declared to return a
> > ! group of values, either as a single row, or a group of rows, like a
> > ! table. Such a function generates its output by
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> --- 132,142
>
>
>
> ! PL/pgSQL functions can also be declared to return a
> ! group of values, either as a single row, or a group of rows, like a
> ! table. Such a function generates its output by executing
> ! RETURN NEXT for each
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Agreed. I couldn't find any value to that phrase and couldn't find better
> > wording, so I removed it. Patch attached and applied.
>
> This is not an improvement.
>
> The point of the original wording is that you have to say
>
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Agreed. I couldn't find any value to that phrase and couldn't find better
> wording, so I removed it. Patch attached and applied.
This is not an improvement.
The point of the original wording is that you have to say
RETURNS SETOF sometype
you c
Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> Neil Conway a ?crit :
> > On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 08:17 +0100, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> >> This patch fixes two issues on plpgsql.sgml.
> >
> > The first hunk seems like a regression to me: AFAICS the current
> > phrasing is what is intended.
> >
> > *** 133,139
>
Neil Conway a écrit :
> On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 08:17 +0100, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
>> This patch fixes two issues on plpgsql.sgml.
>
> The first hunk seems like a regression to me: AFAICS the current
> phrasing is what is intended.
>
> *** 133,139
>
>
>PL/pgSQL functions c
On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 08:17 +0100, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> This patch fixes two issues on plpgsql.sgml.
The first hunk seems like a regression to me: AFAICS the current
phrasing is what is intended.
*** 133,139
PL/pgSQL functions can also be declared to return
! a se
Hi,
This patch fixes two issues on plpgsql.sgml. Please review them
carefully, at least the second one. Thanks.
Regards.
PS : this patch should be in context diff if my .cvsrc is correctly set
up... at least, it doesn't look like my previous patch :)
--
Guillaume.
http://www.postgresqlfr.org
