Re: [DOCS] Two points about docs

2005-05-17 Thread Vladimir Chukharev
On Wed, 11 May 2005 10:00:02 +0300, Michael Glaesemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On May 11, 2005, at 15:50, Vladimir Chukharev wrote: And I still think that an additional Appendix with a list of all functions and referencies to their descriptions would be very usefull. Can you comment on that? Th

Re: [DOCS] Two points about docs

2005-05-11 Thread Michael Glaesemann
On May 11, 2005, at 22:39, Tom Lane wrote: Michael Glaesemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: This has been brought up in the past. I don't think there's any reason there can't be one. Want to make a function appendix? :) I think this is more conventionally called an index ;-) Hehe :) Thanks, Tom! I do

Re: [DOCS] Two points about docs

2005-05-11 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian writes: > > !consistent between the various implementations. This chapter is also > > !not exhaustive; additional functions appear in relivant sections of > > !the manual. > > "relevant", please. Yea, Neil got it. -- Bruce Momjian

Re: [DOCS] Two points about docs

2005-05-11 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian writes: > !consistent between the various implementations. This chapter is also > !not exhaustive; additional functions appear in relivant sections of > !the manual. "relevant", please. regards, tom lane ---(end of bro

Re: [DOCS] Two points about docs

2005-05-11 Thread Tom Lane
Michael Glaesemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On May 11, 2005, at 15:50, Vladimir Chukharev wrote: >> And I still think that an additional Appendix with a list of all >> functions and referencies to their descriptions would be very usefull. >> Can you comment on that? > This has been brought up

Re: [DOCS] Two points about docs

2005-05-11 Thread Bruce Momjian
Vladimir Chukharev wrote: > On Tue, 10 May 2005 04:50:16 +0300, Bruce Momjian > wrote: > > > Vladimir Chukharev wrote: > >> About the link to the lo_* functions. I thought about adding > >> a sentence to Charpter 9 like 'And functions to manipulate large > >> objects are presented in Charpter 28

Re: [DOCS] Two points about docs

2005-05-11 Thread Michael Glaesemann
On May 11, 2005, at 15:50, Vladimir Chukharev wrote: And I still think that an additional Appendix with a list of all functions and referencies to their descriptions would be very usefull. Can you comment on that? This has been brought up in the past. I don't think there's any reason there can't b

Re: [DOCS] Two points about docs

2005-05-10 Thread Vladimir Chukharev
On Tue, 10 May 2005 04:50:16 +0300, Bruce Momjian wrote: Vladimir Chukharev wrote: About the link to the lo_* functions. I thought about adding a sentence to Charpter 9 like 'And functions to manipulate large objects are presented in Charpter 28.' right after the phrase 'Users can also define the

Re: [DOCS] Two points about docs

2005-05-09 Thread Bruce Momjian
Vladimir Chukharev wrote: > On Sun, 08 May 2005 06:18:04 +0300, Bruce Momjian > wrote: > > > I have added your first two suggestions. Not sure where to put the > > large object links in the function section. It seems out of place there > > to me. > > Thanks! > > About the link to the lo_* f

Re: [DOCS] Two points about docs

2005-05-07 Thread Bruce Momjian
I have added your first two suggestions. Not sure where to put the large object links in the function section. It seems out of place there to me. --- Vladimir Chukharev wrote: > Hi, > > I think that docs can be improved

[DOCS] Two points about docs

2005-03-31 Thread Vladimir Chukharev
Hi, I think that docs can be improved a bit in two places. 1. Description of SELECT ( http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/static/sql-select.html ) says 'SELECT retrieves rows from one or more tables.' This is not perfectly correct, because 0 tables can be used like in 'SELECT 1;'. When I tried to f