Re: [DOCS] Using '>' in docs

On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 10:53:51PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 10:51:25PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > Bruce Momjian writes: > > > I see 34 instance of "=>" in our docs. Shouldn't the '>' be escaped, > > > e.g. =>? > > > > In principle, yes, though you can often get away

Re: [DOCS] Using '>' in docs

On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 10:51:25PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian writes: > > I see 34 instance of "=>" in our docs. Shouldn't the '>' be escaped, > > e.g. =>? > > In principle, yes, though you can often get away with this as long as > there's not a '<' nearby ... Yeah, that's what I th

Re: [DOCS] Using '>' in docs

Bruce Momjian writes: > I see 34 instance of "=>" in our docs. Shouldn't the '>' be escaped, > e.g. =>? In principle, yes, though you can often get away with this as long as there's not a '<' nearby ... regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs

[DOCS] Using '>' in docs

I see 34 instance of "=>" in our docs. Shouldn't the '>' be escaped, e.g. =>? -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. + -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org) To