Le 21/04/2017 à 17:45, Tom Lane a écrit :
> Christophe Courtois writes:
>> I've found out that the example in intagg.sgml is wrongly named: the
>> one-to-many table is a many-to-many.
> Well, it'd depend on how it was used. The example clearly intends that
> it be one-to-many, and I'm not sure it
Christophe Courtois writes:
> I've found out that the example in intagg.sgml is wrongly named: the
> one-to-many table is a many-to-many.
Well, it'd depend on how it was used. The example clearly intends that
it be one-to-many, and I'm not sure it still makes sense without that
restriction. May
Hi,
I've found out that the example in intagg.sgml is wrongly named: the
one-to-many table is a many-to-many.
And my colleague Thibaut Madeleine has seen that the "CREATE TABLE
right" and "CREATE TABLE left" examples cannot compile due to the
reserved words.
I propose the attached patch to fix t
