Re: [DOCS] Aggregate expression syntax

Tom Lane-2 wrote > Thom Brown < > thom@ > > writes: >> Looking at the syntax for aggregate expressions in the docs, it seems the >> first three forms could perhaps be merged since the ALL and DISTINCT >> keywords are effectively optional. > > Dunno, just seems harder to read to me... I'm genera

Re: [DOCS] Aggregate expression syntax

Thom Brown writes: > Looking at the syntax for aggregate expressions in the docs, it seems the > first three forms could perhaps be merged since the ALL and DISTINCT > keywords are effectively optional. Dunno, just seems harder to read to me... regards, tom lane -- Sen