On 08/09/2013 07:31 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Josh Berkus writes:
>> Actually, on further feedback from the organizer, it's not 2 days, it's
>> *five*. I don't know too many of us who can afford a full week to work
>> on community documentation. Oh well, we'll have to do it on our own :-(
>
> Do th
On 08/11/2013 12:04 PM, Craig Kerstiens wrote:
> Don't want to put too much pressure on others, but if interested I'm pretty
> sure I could be available the full week, and would be happy to commit the
> time.
Yeah, the problem is that they want 3-5 community members who can
commit. And we've m
Don't want to put too much pressure on others, but if interested I'm pretty
sure I could be available the full week, and would be happy to commit the time.
~ Craig
On Sunday, August 11, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 08/09/2013 07:31 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Josh Berkus mailto:j...@
UPDATE: I just made contact with the coordinator of the "2013 Doc Camp Call for
Proposals".
• We just missed the August 7 deadline. Can we still sneak in?
--> Yes, if we hurry.
• Do they insist on people showing up for the full five days?
--> Yes, you must commit to all 5 days. (October 14-18, 2
On Aug 3, 2013, at 18:45, Craig Kerstiens wrote:
> There's a great set of reference docs, but in terms of getting started its
> quite painful.
Yes, I can speak from experience that getting started with Postgres is
definitely the biggest obstacle to its adoption. The Postgres docs don't help
e
(2013/08/06 5:15), Steve Atkins wrote:
On Aug 5, 2013, at 1:10 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On Mon, 2013-08-05 at 09:41 -0700, Steve Atkins wrote:
For real newbies a major hurdle is getting the server up and
a user / database created, so a platform-specific "actually getting
up and running" pr
Josh Berkus writes:
> Actually, on further feedback from the organizer, it's not 2 days, it's
> *five*. I don't know too many of us who can afford a full week to work
> on community documentation. Oh well, we'll have to do it on our own :-(
Do they insist on people showing up for the full five
On 08/03/2013 06:45 PM, Craig Kerstiens wrote:
> Count me as both intrigued and interest.
>
> Josh and others may know my feelings… The Postgres tutorial needs to be
> entirely blown up. There's a great set of reference docs, but in terms of
> getting started its quite painful. I suspect with
Count me as both intrigued and interest.
Josh and others may know my feelings… The Postgres tutorial needs to be
entirely blown up. There's a great set of reference docs, but in terms of
getting started its quite painful. I suspect with some information on what
people are paying to in the ex
On Aug 5, 2013, at 1:10 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-08-05 at 09:41 -0700, Steve Atkins wrote:
>> For real newbies a major hurdle is getting the server up and
>> a user / database created, so a platform-specific "actually getting
>> up and running" prequel tutorial would also be a
On Mon, 2013-08-05 at 09:41 -0700, Steve Atkins wrote:
> For real newbies a major hurdle is getting the server up and
> a user / database created, so a platform-specific "actually getting
> up and running" prequel tutorial would also be a big improvement.
>
I agree. The real gap we have are platf
On Aug 5, 2013, at 9:20 AM, David Fetter wrote:
> +1 for PostgreSQL tutorials that actually tutor. Is it worth trying
> to do a baseline general one first, or going directly to separate ones
> for DBAs, app & DB developers, etc.?
For real newbies a major hurdle is getting the server up and
a u
+1 for PostgreSQL tutorials that actually tutor. Is it worth trying
to do a baseline general one first, or going directly to separate ones
for DBAs, app & DB developers, etc.?
Cheers,
David.
On Sat, Aug 03, 2013 at 06:45:49PM -0700, Craig Kerstiens wrote:
> Count me as both intrigued and interest
13 matches
Mail list logo
