Re: [DOCS] Supported platforms list

2008-01-31 Thread Tom Lane
I wrote: > This is exactly *not* what I wanted to do, as it removes all traces > of knowledge about which platforms are likely to work (or not work) > despite not being represented in the current buildfarm. It also > seems a bit silly to copy-and-paste today's buildfarm roster into > static docume

Re: [DOCS] Supported platforms list

2008-01-31 Thread Christopher Browne
On Jan 31, 2008 5:29 PM, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Christopher Browne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Attached is a patch. > > > I have changed the discussion to focus on the buildfarm process, and > > it should be recognized that this does change the "shape" of how this > > section r

Re: [DOCS] Supported platforms list

2008-01-31 Thread Dave Page
On Jan 31, 2008 5:35 PM, Joshua D. Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 12:29:05 -0500 > Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Can't speak to Slackware or Irix, but IMHO Fedora and HP/UX deserve to > > I know of at least one

Re: [DOCS] Supported platforms list

2008-01-31 Thread Joshua D. Drake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 12:29:05 -0500 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can't speak to Slackware or Irix, but IMHO Fedora and HP/UX deserve to I know of at least one core member who hearts Slackware. :) Joshua D. Drake - -- The PostgreSQL Compan

Re: [DOCS] Supported platforms list

2008-01-31 Thread Tom Lane
"Christopher Browne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Attached is a patch. > I have changed the discussion to focus on the buildfarm process, and > it should be recognized that this does change the "shape" of how this > section recognizes platforms as being "supported." This is exactly *not* what I

Re: [DOCS] Supported platforms list

2008-01-31 Thread Christopher Browne
On Jan 30, 2008 11:00 PM, Christopher Browne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 30, 2008 9:59 PM, Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So someone will need to update that list very soon then. I don't think we > > can > > release it as is. > > Howbeit I'll see about grabbing the existi

Re: [DOCS] Supported platforms list

2008-01-30 Thread Christopher Browne
On Jan 30, 2008 9:59 PM, Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So someone will need to update that list very soon then. I don't think we can > release it as is. Howbeit I'll see about grabbing the existing buildfarm list of HEAD nodes that are running successfully, and turning that into a

Re: [DOCS] Supported platforms list

2008-01-30 Thread Peter Eisentraut
So someone will need to update that list very soon then. I don't think we can release it as is. -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/ ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desir

Re: [DOCS] Supported platforms list

2008-01-30 Thread Tom Lane
"Christopher Browne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Jan 30, 2008 11:19 AM, Dave Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Jan 30, 2008 11:15 AM, Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> The supported platforms list in the installation instructions is completely >>> un-updated for 8.3. Is this

Re: [DOCS] Supported platforms list

2008-01-30 Thread Christopher Browne
On Jan 30, 2008 11:19 AM, Dave Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 30, 2008 11:15 AM, Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The supported platforms list in the installation instructions is completely > > un-updated for 8.3. Is this list still useful? What shall we do with it? > > I

Re: [DOCS] Supported platforms list

2008-01-30 Thread Dave Page
On Jan 30, 2008 11:15 AM, Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The supported platforms list in the installation instructions is completely > un-updated for 8.3. Is this list still useful? What shall we do with it? I think it's important to keep in the docs so people know what we've test