Re: [DOCS] broken index references

2013-12-03 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 11/30/13, 8:34 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: >> >> > If an unquoted colon (:) followed by a >> > psql variable name appears within an argument, it is >> > replaced by the variable's value, as described in > > linkend="APP-PSQL-interpolation" >> > endterm="APP-PSQL-interpolation-

Re: [DOCS] broken index references

2013-11-30 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 05:23:14PM -0500, Josh Kupershmidt wrote: > > Sorry to be looking at this late, but I just tested the 9.3.1 PDF at: > > > > > > http://www.postgresql.org/files/documentation/pdf/9.3/postgresql-9.3-US.pdf > > > > and the link on page 1748 that links to section 31.14

Re: [DOCS] broken index references

2013-11-30 Thread Josh Kupershmidt
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 04:25:17PM -0700, Josh Kupershmidt wrote: >> On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >> > A different PDF-output problem that I've been noticing for awhile is that >> > certain intra-page links don't work.

Re: [DOCS] broken index references

2013-11-30 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 04:25:17PM -0700, Josh Kupershmidt wrote: > On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > > A different PDF-output problem that I've been noticing for awhile is that > > certain intra-page links don't work. The only clue I've found about it > > is the warnings in the

Re: [DOCS] broken index references

2013-03-29 Thread Josh Kupershmidt
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > A different PDF-output problem that I've been noticing for awhile is that > certain intra-page links don't work. The only clue I've found about it > is the warnings in the TeX log, for instance: I could have overlooked a working example.. but a

Re: [DOCS] broken index references

2013-03-23 Thread Tom Lane
Josh Kupershmidt writes: > If you search through recent 9.2 or 9.3dev PDFs for the string "??" > you should find ten occurrences. Other than the first instance in > Chapter 9, the other nine are all in the index, and indicate an > unknown reference to some index entry. ... > AFAICT tex is getting