I tried sending this yesterday with the PDF attached, but I haven't
seen it show up on the list. This is the same email sans attachment.
---
I was feeling particularly organizational today and redrew one of the
figures from the documentation. In the PostgreSQL 7.3 PDF
documentation, it's the Sys
Michael Glaesemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I was feeling particularly organizational today and redrew one of the
> figures from the documentation. In the PostgreSQL 7.3 PDF
> documentation, it's the System Catalogs Diagram, or Figure 3. The major
> POSTGRES system catalogs.
Peter just rem
On Monday, November 10, 2003, at 12:16 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Michael Glaesemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I was feeling particularly organizational today and redrew one of the
figures from the documentation. In the PostgreSQL 7.3 PDF
documentation, it's the System Catalogs Diagram, or Figure 3. Th
Michael Glaesemann writes:
> Well, looks like I'm 0-2. I used InDesign, which is a *long* way from
> open source. I can definitely understand that being able to maintain it
> is a virtue. If you'd like to include an up-to-date version, knowing
> you might have to throw it out at a later date when
Michael,
> Well, looks like I'm 0-2. I used InDesign, which is a *long* way from
> open source. I can definitely understand that being able to maintain it
> is a virtue. If you'd like to include an up-to-date version, knowing
> you might have to throw it out at a later date when it gets too old to
Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Glaesemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I was feeling particularly organizational today and redrew one of the
> > figures from the documentation. In the PostgreSQL 7.3 PDF
> > documentation, it's the System Catalogs Diagram, or Figure 3. The major
> > POSTGRES system
