On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 23:18, Neil Conway wrote:
> Oliver Elphick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The use of the word "log" in the directory name does tend to invite
> > this error, and some have acted on it without asking first. I think
> > initdb should put a README.IMPORTANT file in $PGDATA to s
$BL$>5Bz9-9p!v#22/!"#32/!"#52/[EMAIL PROTECTED]|1_<}F~Z6(2q(B $B;3CfH~Jf$H?=$7$^$9!#(B
$B(B
$BG[?.Dd;_$OBgJQ62=L$G$9$,(B
(Bhttp://www.hosyou.net/cgi-bin/postmail/teishi.html
$B$GAw?.$*4j$$?=$7>e$2$^$9!#!!(B
(B
(B *==*==*==***==*$B!!$40';"!!(B*==*==*==*==
In file create_trigger.sgml line 25 is written:
funcname
and in line 36 is written:
class="parameter">func
and in line 146 is written:
func
I think it should be func or funcname in all these
lines.
In line 40 is written:
... either before before the
Halley
=?iso-8859-1?q?Halley=20Pacheco=20de=20Oliveira?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [ mistakes in create_trigger.sgml ]
Patches applied. Thanks for the report!
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 8: explain analyze i
[sNip]
> Pretty much, yes. I don't care much about printing html. If I want
> to print I figure I'm better off getting a PDF.
I prefer to print from PDF also because the formatting is always
perfect. Unfortunately this just hasn't been the case with any other format,
including HTML,
I had to remove the factorial example from the casting docs because
factorial is now defined only for numeric. Would someone take the
attached example and make a new one with a different operator?
Thanks.
---
Gavin Sherr
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I had to remove the factorial example from the casting docs because
> factorial is now defined only for numeric. Would someone take the
> attached example and make a new one with a different operator?
Done.
regards, tom lane
Oliver Elphick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 23:18, Neil Conway wrote:
>> I do agree that we could stand to document the purpose of pg_clog
>> and pg_xlog more clearly. However, this information belongs in the
>> standard documentation, not scattered throughout $PGDATA.
> The
Tom Lane wrote:
> Oliver Elphick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 23:18, Neil Conway wrote:
> >> I do agree that we could stand to document the purpose of pg_clog
> >> and pg_xlog more clearly. However, this information belongs in the
> >> standard documentation, not scattered
Oliver Elphick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The use of the word "log" in the directory name does tend to invite
> this error, and some have acted on it without asking first. I think
> initdb should put a README.IMPORTANT file in $PGDATA to say [...]
If someone deletes something from $PGDATA with
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
>>Oliver Elphick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>>On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 23:18, Neil Conway wrote:
>>>
I do agree that we could stand to document the purpose of pg_clog
and pg_xlog more clearly. However, this information belongs in the
standard
11 matches
Mail list logo