Re: [DOCS] My SGML build fixed

-On [20031218 01:22], Bruce Momjian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >How often does the postgresql.org site build the SGML files? And just >last week the News build failed because it lost execution bits. I still >don't trust dynamic content on postgresql.org to work reliably. It can

Re: [DOCS] My SGML build fixed

Bruce Momjian writes: > How often does the postgresql.org site build the SGML files? Whenever something changes. > And just > last week the News build failed because it lost execution bits. Uh, so? Your reasoning is that because some unrelated program on an unrelated machine breaks, we should a

Re: [DOCS] problem with getting return type mismatch from function

Jackson, Harold writes: > Any ideas? No. This list is for discussing documentation issues. ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [DOCS] My SGML build fixed

Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Bruce Momjian writes: > > How often does the postgresql.org site build the SGML files? > > Whenever something changes. How often does the SGML check, or is it tied into CVS commit and happens automatically? > > And just > > last week the News build failed because it los

Re: [DOCS] My SGML build fixed

Bruce Momjian writes: > How often does the SGML check, 5 minutes > It means there is still too much instability in the running processes on > those machines, yea. Oops, then we better hurry and get the CVS repository and the mailing lists off these machines. ---(end o

Re: [DOCS] My SGML build fixed

"Peter Eisentraut" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Right now it just seems like a waste of resources and it confuses the > onlookers. If Bruce is willing to expend the resources, what's the problem? I kinda like having some redundancy in this service, myself. regards, tom la

Re: [DOCS] My SGML build fixed

Tom Lane wrote: > "Peter Eisentraut" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Right now it just seems like a waste of resources and it confuses > > the onlookers. > > If Bruce is willing to expend the resources, what's the problem? > I kinda like having some redundancy in this service, myself. Bruce said h

Re: [DOCS] My SGML build fixed

Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > However, maybe we should structure the developer website listing > differently, such as > Development version of the documentation > * Mirror 0 > * Mirror 1 > so onlookers see that they are two more or less identical versions of > the same service.