Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> I have applied the following doc update for plperl, now that perl has
>> an --enable-shared configure option.
> Maybe this should be rephrased to say that only newer versions (exactly
> which?) have that option.
And why did t
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I thought about that. The docs were pointing to an FAQ number that
> > doesn't exit anymore, and there is text indicating sometimes the
> > shared compile isn't needed, so I didn't want to hard-code a version
> > number in case it wasn't significa
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I have applied the following doc update for plperl, now that perl has
> > an --enable-shared configure option.
>
> Maybe this should be rephrased to say that only newer versions (exactly
> which?) have that option.
I thought about that. The doc
Sure. Anyone want to research this?
---
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I thought about that. The docs were pointing to an FAQ number that
> > doesn't exit anymore, and there is text indicating sometimes
Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> I have applied the following doc update for plperl, now that perl has
> >> an --enable-shared configure option.
>
> > Maybe this should be rephrased to say that only newer versions (exactly
> > which?) ha
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I have applied the following doc update for plperl, now that perl has
> an --enable-shared configure option.
Maybe this should be rephrased to say that only newer versions (exactly
which?) have that option.
---(end of broadcast)
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I thought about that. The docs were pointing to an FAQ number that
> doesn't exit anymore, and there is text indicating sometimes the
> shared compile isn't needed, so I didn't want to hard-code a version
> number in case it wasn't significant aoyway. And if I say newer, it
