Hi,
I tried to get a PDF version of the pgsql
documentation. the process i used is as follows
$ cd $PGSQL_ROOT
$ ./configure
$ cd $PG_ROOT/doc/src/sgml
$ gmake postgres.pdf
the outpout i get is as follows :
LC_ALL=C "/usr/bin/perl" /usr/bin/collateindex.pl -f
-g -o bookindex.sgml -N
{ \
Saquib Farooq Malik wrote:
openjade -D . -c
/usr/share/sgml/docbook/dsssl-stylesheets/catalog -d
stylesheet.dsl -t tex -V tex-backend -i output-print
-V texpdf-output -o postgres.tex-pdf postgres.sgml
and that's it, the prompt never comes back.
Some people have reported extremely long build
Hi,
On 6/7/05, Saquib Farooq Malik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can anybody please tell me why the process hangs up
IMHO, you can try using strace (or any similar variant) to see if it's
working in the background. (There could also be a verbose param. for
jade too.) HTH.
Regards.
--
Volkan YAZICI wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 6/7/05, Saquib Farooq Malik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Can anybody please tell me why the process hangs up
>
> IMHO, you can try using strace (or any similar variant) to see if it's
> working in the background. (There could also be a verbose param. for
> jade
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Would someone report this to the SGML guys and get them to fix it?
There are no SGML guys anymore. The toolchain is abandoned.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Would someone report this to the SGML guys and get them to fix it?
>
> There are no SGML guys anymore. The toolchain is abandoned.
Oh, you mean we are using tools from an abandoned project? What replace
it and should we be using that?
--
Br
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 05:59:19PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Would someone report this to the SGML guys and get them to fix it?
>
> There are no SGML guys anymore. The toolchain is abandoned.
Excellent :-( How about we discuss again whether to move to XML? I
ass
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Excellent :-( How about we discuss again whether to move to XML?
You can already use "XML" today. Go to doc/src/sgml and type "make
testxml" and you'll get HTML documentation built using XSLT
stylesheets.
The bad news, however, is that using the XSLT toolchain the stat
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Excellent :-( How about we discuss again whether to move to XML?
You can already use "XML" today. Go to doc/src/sgml and type "make
testxml" and you'll get HTML documentation built using XSLT
stylesheets.
One way to do it, is to make an R
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 05:59:19PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> There are no SGML guys anymore. The toolchain is abandoned.
> Excellent :-( How about we discuss again whether to move to XML? I
> assume there is a newer toolchain for that.
As fa
10 matches
Mail list logo
