Re: [DOCS] Mention pg_dump version portability

2006-05-16 Thread Jim C. Nasby
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 07:43:20PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Jim C. Nasby wrote: > > On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 12:21:06PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > I have applied this patch that mentions pg_dump portability to 8.1.X and > > > CVS HEAD. > > > > Would it be worth recommending using the cu

Re: [DOCS] Mention pg_dump version portability

2006-05-16 Thread Tom Lane
"Jim C. Nasby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > But shouldn't the custom format deal better with version changes, or > does the format of custom change just as often? It's completely orthogonal, because the SQL involved is just the same. One of the tests I periodically run is to compare pg_du