Hello Bruce,
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Here is a new replication documentation section I want to add for 8.2:
ftp://momjian.us/pub/postgresql/mypatches/replication
Comments welcomed.
Thank you, that sounds good. It's targeted to production use and
currently available solutions, which mak
Hannu Krosing wrote:
I think the "official" term for this kind of "replication" is
Shared-Nothing Clustering.
Well, that's just another distinction for clusters. Most of the time
it's between Shared-Disk vs. Shared-Nothing. You could also see the very
Big Irons as a Shared-Everything Cluster.
Bruce,
> Here is my first draft of a new replication section for our
> documentation. I am looking for any comments.
Hmmm ... while the primer on different types of replication is fine, I
think what users were really looking for is a listing of the different
replication solutions which are ava
Hello Josh,
Josh Berkus wrote:
Hmmm ... while the primer on different types of replication is fine, I
think what users were really looking for is a listing of the different
replication solutions which are available for PostgreSQL and how to get
them.
Well, let's see what we have:
* Shared D
> Looking at that, I'm a) missing PgCluster and b) arguing that we have to
> admit that we simply can not 'list .. replication solutions ... and how
> to get them' because all of the solutions mentioned need quite some
> knowledge and require a more or less complex installation and
> configuration
On Tue, 2006-10-24 at 12:34 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > Looking at that, I'm a) missing PgCluster and b) arguing that we have to
> > admit that we simply can not 'list .. replication solutions ... and how
> > to get them' because all of the solutions mentioned need quite some
> > knowledge an
Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-10-24 at 12:34 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>> Looking at that, I'm a) missing PgCluster and b) arguing that we have to
>>> admit that we simply can not 'list .. replication solutions ... and how
>>> to get them' because all of the solutions mentioned need quite
On Tue, 2006-10-24 at 00:20 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Here is a new replication documentation section I want to add for 8.2:
>
> ftp://momjian.us/pub/postgresql/mypatches/replication
>
> Comments welcomed.
It's a very good start to a complete minefield of competing solutions.
My first
On Tue, 2006-10-24 at 15:13 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> If it were me, I would say that the replication option has to be
> specific to PostgreSQL (e.g; cjdbc or synchronous jakarta pooling
> doesn't go in).
...and how do you define PostgreSQL exactly?
--
Simon Riggs
Enterpr
Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-10-24 at 15:13 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
>> If it were me, I would say that the replication option has to be
>> specific to PostgreSQL (e.g; cjdbc or synchronous jakarta pooling
>> doesn't go in).
>
> ...and how do you define PostgreSQL exactly?
I replicat
On Tue, 2006-10-24 at 15:33 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-10-24 at 15:13 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >
> >> If it were me, I would say that the replication option has to be
> >> specific to PostgreSQL (e.g; cjdbc or synchronous jakarta pooling
> >> doesn't
Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-10-24 at 15:33 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> Simon Riggs wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2006-10-24 at 15:13 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>>
If it were me, I would say that the replication option has to be
specific to PostgreSQL (e.g; cjdbc or synchronous jakarta
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 11:39:34PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Query Broadcast Replication
> ---
>
> This involves sending write queries to multiple servers. Read-only
> queries can be sent to a single server because there is no need for all
> servers to process it. Th
On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 03:33:03PM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-10-24 at 15:13 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >
> >> If it were me, I would say that the replication option has to be
> >> specific to PostgreSQL (e.g; cjdbc or synchronous jakarta pooling
> >>
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 03:33:03PM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> Simon Riggs wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2006-10-24 at 15:13 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>>
If it were me, I would say that the replication option has to be
specific to PostgreSQL (e.g; cjdbc or synchronous
OK, I have updated the URL. Please let me know how you like it.
---
Hannu Krosing wrote:
> ?hel kenal p?eval, T, 2006-10-24 kell 00:20, kirjutas Bruce Momjian:
> > Here is a new replication documentation section I want to a
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
AFAIK Continuent's product fails that test...
To my knowledge, p/cluster only works with PostgreSQL but I could be wrong.
p/cluster was the old name for the PostgreSQL specific version. It's been
rebranded as uni/cluster and they have versions f
I have changed the text to reference "fail over" and "load balancing".
I think it makes it clearer. Let me know what you think. I am hesitant
to mention commercial PostgreSQL products in our documentation.
---
Markus Schi
Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-10-24 at 00:20 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Here is a new replication documentation section I want to add for 8.2:
> >
> > ftp://momjian.us/pub/postgresql/mypatches/replication
> >
> > Comments welcomed.
>
> It's a very good start to a complete minefield
I have updated the text. Please let me know what else I should change.
I am unsure if I should be mentioning commercial PostgreSQL products in
our documentation.
---
Hannu Krosing wrote:
> ?hel kenal p?eval, T, 2006-10-24
Markus Schiltknecht wrote:
> Looking at that, I'm a) missing PgCluster and b) arguing that we have to
> admit that we simply can not 'list .. replication solutions ... and how
> to get them' because all of the solutions mentioned need quite some
> knowledge and require a more or less complex ins
I don't think the PostgreSQL documentation should be mentioning
commercial solutions.
---
Luke Lonergan wrote:
> Bruce,
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> > Looking at that, I'm a) missing PgCluster and b) arguing that we have to
> > admit that we simply can not 'list .. replication solutions ... and how
> > to get them' because all of the solutions mentioned need quite some
> > knowledge and require a more or less complex
Bruce,
> I have updated the text. Please let me know what else I should change.
> I am unsure if I should be mentioning commercial PostgreSQL products in
> our documentation.
I think you should mention the postgresql-only ones, but just briefly with a
link. Bizgres MPP, ExtenDB, uni/cluster, a
Josh Berkus wrote:
> Bruce,
>
>> I have updated the text. Please let me know what else I should change.
>> I am unsure if I should be mentioning commercial PostgreSQL products in
>> our documentation.
>
> I think you should mention the postgresql-only ones, but just briefly with a
> link. Bizg
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Josh Berkus wrote:
> > Bruce,
> >
> >> I have updated the text. Please let me know what else I should change.
> >> I am unsure if I should be mentioning commercial PostgreSQL products in
> >> our documentation.
> >
> > I think you should mention the postgresql-only ones,
Steve Atkins wrote:
> > If we are to add them, I need to hear that from people who haven't
> > worked in PostgreSQL commerical replication companies.
>
> I'm not coming to PostgreSQL for open source solutions. I'm coming
> to PostgreSQL for _good_ solutions.
>
> I want to see what solutions might
27 matches
Mail list logo
