On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 01:34:01PM +0900, Hiroshi Saito wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Please check it.
> Thanks!
Applied, thanks.
(Oh, sorry, forgot to put your name on the commit :-S)
//Magnus
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet
On Mon, 15 Oct 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
The current documentation seems a bit inconsistent in its use of the
terms "token" and "lexeme". The majority of the text seems to use
"lexeme" exclusively, which is inconsistent with the fact that the
term "token" is exposed by ts_token_type() and friends.
On Tuesday 16 October 2007 08:14, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 01:34:01PM +0900, Hiroshi Saito wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > Please check it.
> > Thanks!
>
> Applied, thanks.
>
> (Oh, sorry, forgot to put your name on the commit :-S)
>
The link for libpqxx should either be reverted or
On Friday 12 October 2007 14:04, Ian Barwick wrote:
> Hi
>
> attached some minor corrections, mainly completion of removal of
> the "relation with OID # does not exist" item, and some URL
> corrections.
>
I'm curious why this was removed. We still get this question a bit on irc and
there are
On Tuesday 16 October 2007 01:38, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Jeff Frost wrote:
> > On Mon, 15 Oct 2007, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > Seems we didn't have any mention of Slony for upgrades in the migration
> > > section, so I added it:
> > >
> > >
> > > It is also possible to use Slony to create a sla
Robert Treat wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 October 2007 08:14, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 01:34:01PM +0900, Hiroshi Saito wrote:
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> Please check it.
>>> Thanks!
>> Applied, thanks.
>>
>> (Oh, sorry, forgot to put your name on the commit :-S)
>>
>
> The link for libpqxx
Robert Treat wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 October 2007 01:38, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Jeff Frost wrote:
> > > On Mon, 15 Oct 2007, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > > Seems we didn't have any mention of Slony for upgrades in the migration
> > > > section, so I added it:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > It is also p
Robert Treat wrote:
> On Friday 12 October 2007 14:04, Ian Barwick wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > attached some minor corrections, mainly completion of removal of
> > the "relation with OID # does not exist" item, and some URL
> > corrections.
> >
>
> I'm curious why this was removed. We still get thi
On Tuesday 16 October 2007 15:46, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Robert Treat wrote:
> > On Friday 12 October 2007 14:04, Ian Barwick wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > attached some minor corrections, mainly completion of removal of
> > > the "relation with OID # does not exist" item, and some URL
> > > cor
