Re: [DOCS] High Availability, Load Balancing, and Replication Feature Matrix

2007-11-10 Thread Markus Schiltknecht
Hello Bruce, Bruce Momjian wrote: I have added a High Availability, Load Balancing, and Replication Feature Matrix table to the docs: Nice work. I appreciate your efforts in clearing up the uncertainty that surrounds this topic. As you might have guessed, I have some complaints regarding th

Re: [DOCS] High Availability, Load Balancing, and Replication Feature Matrix

2007-11-10 Thread Bruce Momjian
Markus Schiltknecht wrote: > Hello Bruce, > > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > I have added a High Availability, Load Balancing, and Replication > > Feature Matrix table to the docs: > > Nice work. I appreciate your efforts in clearing up the uncertainty that > surrounds this topic. > > As you might ha

[DOCS] Placement of contrib modules in SGML documentation

2007-11-10 Thread Tom Lane
I am still desperately unhappy with the choice to put the contrib docs where they were put. They are by no stretch of the imagination part of the "SQL Language", and there is no defense for having inserted them into the middle of the part, in front of substantially more widely interesting informat

Re: [DOCS] Placement of contrib modules in SGML documentation

2007-11-10 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: > I am still desperately unhappy with the choice to put the contrib docs > where they were put. They are by no stretch of the imagination part of > the "SQL Language", and there is no defense for having inserted them > into the middle of the part, in front of substantially more wid

Re: [DOCS] Placement of contrib modules in SGML documentation

2007-11-10 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> BTW, why are neither contrib/dblink nor contrib/spi included in the >> conversion? > I see dblink: > http://momjian.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/dblink.html Oh, in that case the question is why the contrib/db/doc/ files are still there. > I assum

Re: [DOCS] Placement of contrib modules in SGML documentation

2007-11-10 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> BTW, why are neither contrib/dblink nor contrib/spi included in the > >> conversion? > > > I see dblink: > > http://momjian.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/dblink.html > > Oh, in that case the question is why the contrib/db/doc/ fil