Re: [HACKERS] [DOCS] "distributed checkpoint"

2007-12-12 Thread Josh Berkus
All, Just FYI, it's going to be difficult to replace the name of the feature in the PR docs at this point; I already have 11 translations. What's *wrong* with "Load Distributed Checkpoint", which is what we've been calling it for 6 months? -- --Josh Josh Berkus PostgreSQL @ Sun San Francisc

Re: [HACKERS] [DOCS] "distributed checkpoint"

2007-12-12 Thread Bruce Momjian
Josh Berkus wrote: > All, > > Just FYI, it's going to be difficult to replace the name of the feature in > the PR docs at this point; I already have 11 translations. What's *wrong* > with "Load Distributed Checkpoint", which is what we've been calling it > for 6 months? There was nothing *wro

Re: [HACKERS] [DOCS] "distributed checkpoint"

2007-12-12 Thread Greg Smith
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007, Josh Berkus wrote: What's *wrong* with "Load Distributed Checkpoint", which is what we've been calling it for 6 months? One issue was that "distributed" has some association with distributed computing, which isn't actually the case. "Spread" is also more descriptive of

Re: [HACKERS] [DOCS] "distributed checkpoint"

2007-12-12 Thread Magnus Hagander
> Just FYI, it's going to be difficult to replace the name of the feature in > the PR docs at this point; I already have 11 translations. What's *wrong* > with "Load Distributed Checkpoint", which is what we've been calling it > for 6 months? > Are you saying the PR was 'string freezed' befor