doc/src/sgml/Makefile asserts
# Regular TeX and pdfTeX have slightly differing requirements, so we
# need to distinguish the path we're taking.
However, diff'ing the results shows that the .tex-pdf and .tex-ps output
files are actually identical. Would it be reasonable to simplify the
Makefile b
On tor, 2010-04-29 at 10:53 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> doc/src/sgml/Makefile asserts
>
> # Regular TeX and pdfTeX have slightly differing requirements, so we
> # need to distinguish the path we're taking.
>
> However, diff'ing the results shows that the .tex-pdf and .tex-ps output
> files are actua
Peter Eisentraut writes:
> On tor, 2010-04-29 at 10:53 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> However, diff'ing the results shows that the .tex-pdf and .tex-ps output
>> files are actually identical. Would it be reasonable to simplify the
>> Makefile by eliminating the separate build rules? I guess we'd have
On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 20:54 +, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Move alpha release notes into a separate file; re-align sgml tags.
>
> Modified Files:
> --
> pgsql/doc/src/sgml:
> release-9.0.sgml (r2.16 -> r2.17)
>
> (http://anoncvs.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/doc/src/sgml
Devrim G?ND?Z wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 20:54 +, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Move alpha release notes into a separate file; re-align sgml tags.
> >
> > Modified Files:
> > --
> > pgsql/doc/src/sgml:
> > release-9.0.sgml (r2.16 -> r2.17
