On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 16:07, Euler Taveira de Oliveira
wrote:
> Sure. But bear in mind that we don't usually backpatch documentation unless
> there is incorrect information; improvement belongs to HEAD.
Yeah, it is quite incorrect (as you can see by comparing test results
from 1st post with the
[Sorry, I'm revisiting this topic a bit late.. have had a lot of stuff
keeping me busy]
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> In general, I think the more efficient way to address this overall
> problem is to run the resulting HTML through tidy and be done with it.
Running t
Josh Kupershmidt writes:
> I think it would be a good idea to add a step in ./sgml/Makefile to
> run tidy on all the .html files produced. Anyone interested in doing
> this?
I'm a bit concerned about starting to depend on tidy as part of our
build process, because the upstream project seems in, u
