Re: [DOCS] remove undocumented assign syntax from plpgsql doc

2014-01-12 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 06:38:04AM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote: > > > > 2014/1/12 Bruce Momjian > > On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 10:06:27PM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote: > > > > > > > > 2014/1/11 Tom Lane > > > >     Bruce Momjian writes: > >     > Oh, I think you are

Re: [DOCS] remove undocumented assign syntax from plpgsql doc

2014-01-12 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 07:00:09AM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote: > Comment updated.  Patch attached. > > > > Still I am missing message about preferred syntax (or we should to enhance GET > DIAGNOSTICS doc about proprietary syntax). > > PL/pgSQL, PL/SQL is mix of two languages: ADA and SQL -

Re: [DOCS] Upgrading doc does not mention pg_restore at all

2014-01-12 Thread Josh Berkus
On 01/11/2014 03:47 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > It could probably deserve a better descirption of pg_upgrade as well, and > an outline of the differences. Right now we spend the majority of the page > on pg_dump, and then just say "oh, with pg_upgrade it only takes minutes"... Bruce can do that p

Re: [DOCS] remove undocumented assign syntax from plpgsql doc

2014-01-12 Thread Pavel Stehule
2014/1/13 Bruce Momjian > On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 07:00:09AM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote: > > Comment updated. Patch attached. > > > > > > > > Still I am missing message about preferred syntax (or we should to > enhance GET > > DIAGNOSTICS doc about proprietary syntax). > > > > PL/pgSQL, PL/S