=?UTF-8?Q?J=c3=bcrgen_Purtz?= <[email protected]> writes:
> I wonder whether we should have a graphic showing an overview of the
> main backend processes and their interaction with memory and files -
> something like figure 15-1 of:
> https://docs.oracle.com/database/121/CNCPT/process.htm. Or is there a
> general policy to avoid graphics in our documentation - or an advice to
> use a special format for graphics?
There have been discussions about how to incorporate graphics, which
have failed to come to any consensus. Nobody is particularly willing
to put a badly-formatted batch of raw numbers into git though, because
it'd be impossible to do any incremental updates on it and still have
useful git history. There are also a bunch of questions about whether
the graphics would work in all the output formats we try to support.
This particular example doesn't really seem compelling enough to
justify finding a way over those hurdles ...
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
