The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.4/static/ssl-tcp.html
Description:
17.9.1. Using Client Certificates
(https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.4/static/ssl-tcp.html)
The first paragraph contains this line "...and set the client
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/functions-range.html
Description:
On the page https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/functions-range.html
it gives an example for the intersection of range (5,15) and range (10
sri...@gmail.com writes:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.4/static/ssl-tcp.html
> Description:
> 17.9.1. Using Client Certificates
> (https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.4/static/ssl-tcp.html)
> The first paragraph conta
etul...@gmail.com writes:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/functions-range.html
> Description:
> On the page https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/functions-range.html
> it gives an example for the interse
On 5/14/16 2:23 AM, Alexander Law wrote:
> Please look at the following errors/fixes.
I've applied 2, 3, 4, 5.
1 was correct according to my math. (115.9-9.8)/10*1000*1000 = 1061
6 looked too complicated to me. ;-) Can you explain where you got your
number from?
--
Peter Eisentraut
Thank you, Peter.
Regarding 1, you're right, I didn't see "per row" in that sentence and
decided that it was total overhead (and then again I should change nsec
to msec).
Regarding 6, please look at the old documentation:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/pgcrypto.html#PGCRYPTO-HASH-S
