[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I made a CHM that contains all those documents (6 of them) .. It's also in
> http://www.visiomode.com/help/pg/
Cool!
> I would be so happy if you wanted to take my software for the
> editing process .. :) But in any case, if there is use for those
> CHMs, that would be
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm not sure if it would be a bad thing to give up DocBook, but I cannot see
> anything but benefits from using this other type of document development...
I cannot see anything but problems from using this.
- The current usage allows people to work on documents as files
After a long battle with technology, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Oliver Elphick), an earthling,
wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 02:00, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> What is the gmake command to generate PDF docs? I can give it a try but
>> I don't see the rule in the makefile.
>
> cd doc/src/sgml
> make postgres.
Oops! [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Fetter) was seen spray-painting on a wall:
> On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 06:07:13PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> David Fetter wrote:
>> > Expanding on that, putting FK's in "Advanced Features" gives the
>> > (IME always wrong) impression that they're optional.
>>
>>
Clinging to sanity, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Fetter) mumbled into her beard:
> Chris Browne, could you give me a pointer to your patch so we don't
> step on each other's feet?
It was posted on the patches list on 2003-12-29...
--
wm(X,Y):-write(X),write('@'),write(Y). wm('cbbrowne','cbbrowne.com'
In an attempt to throw the authorities off his trail, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bruce
Momjian) transmitted:
> David Fetter wrote:
>> Kind people,
>>
>> I was looking over the Tutorial section, and noticed that Foreign Keys
>> is in the "Advanced" section. I believe this is a mistake, and would
>> like
Martha Stewart called it a Good Thing when pgman@candle.pha.pa.us (Bruce
Momjian) wrote:
> Yep, big mistake my removing the replication FAQ item. I have re-added a
> new one:
>
> 4.21) What replication solutions are available?
>
> Though "replication" is a single term, there are
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>> I suggest the following patch to rename our capability "Continuous
>> Backup".
>
> This doesn't seem like an improvement. "Online backup" is the standard
> terminology AFAIK.
There's something ambiguous about it, in view that there are two
useful points in time for a b
On Jan 30, 2008 11:19 AM, Dave Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 30, 2008 11:15 AM, Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The supported platforms list in the installation instructions is completely
> > un-updated for 8.3. Is this list still useful? What shall we do with it?
>
> I
On Jan 30, 2008 9:59 PM, Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So someone will need to update that list very soon then. I don't think we can
> release it as is.
Howbeit I'll see about grabbing the existing buildfarm list of HEAD
nodes that are running successfully, and turning that into a
On Jan 30, 2008 11:00 PM, Christopher Browne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 30, 2008 9:59 PM, Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So someone will need to update that list very soon then. I don't think we
> > can
> > release it as is.
&
On Jan 31, 2008 5:29 PM, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Christopher Browne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Attached is a patch.
>
> > I have changed the discussion to focus on the buildfarm process, and
> > it should be recognized that this d
sql.org/docs/8.4/static/release-8-0.html
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/static/release-7-4.html
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/static/release-7-3.html
There's a lot of reading to do!
--
let name="cbbrowne" and tld="ca.afilias.info" in name ^ "@" ^ tld
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Susanne Ebrecht wrote:
> Anyway, I figured out there is another argument for XML:
>
> My information is that DocBook 5.0 won't support SGML anymore.
>
> Which means - sooner or later a reaction is needed.
Yes, indeed.
I don't think that during the 9.1 alpha phase
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Alvaro Herrera
wrote:
> Excerpts from Brendan Jurd's message of mar may 31 02:17:22 -0400 2011:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I was working on a little docs patch today, and when I tried to
>> `make`, openjade choked on an identifier in information_schema.sgml,
>> which is ve
15 matches
Mail list logo
