I had a report from a user asking how they could VACUUM in the future
under 9.3, when it's no longer supported (which took me aback). He
referred me to a manual page:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/sql-vacuum.html
I realized, then, that the problem is the wordsmithing of:
"This p
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 3:28 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 1:03 AM, Daniel Farina wrote:
> > I had a report from a user asking how they could VACUUM in the future
> > under 9.3, when it's no longer supported (which took me aback). He
> >
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 5:44 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Daniel Farina writes:
>> On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 3:28 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>> But I can understand the confusion - do you have a suggestion for how
>>> to write it to make it more obvious what the actual probl
