Re: [DOCS] SQL key word list and SQL:2011

ons of the > > standard but then removed (e.g., BIT). Maybe those could be added > > with a note or something. > > Perhaps it'd be useful to keep just SQL-92 and SQL:2011, to give > some sense of how the standard's keyword set has evolved over time > while

Re: [DOCS] Google Doc Camp

GSOC Summit; if we get > > accepted, food & accomodations are paid for, and I can make a good case > > to pay for any airfare costs out of community funds. > > > > Who's up for it? > > > > -- > > Josh Berkus > > PostgreSQL Experts

<    1   2