Re: [DOCS] Current CVS docs producing errors

2003-06-24 Thread Rod Taylor
XRef > LinkEnd to missing ID 'RUNTIME-CONFIG-OPTIMIZER' > make[1]: *** [html] Error 1 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/postgresql-7.4/pgsql/doc/src/sgml' > make: *** [postgres.tar] Error 2 > > ---(end of broadcast)--- > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > >http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html -- Rod Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP Key: http://www.rbt.ca/rbtpub.asc signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [DOCS] Current CVS docs producing errors

2003-06-24 Thread Rod Taylor
On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 23:18, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 22:52:32 -0400, > Rod Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Seems you were caught in mid patch. > > > > They work with cvs sources from 30 minutes ago. > > > > Try up

Re: [DOCS] Mysql -> Postgresql pitfalls

2003-08-04 Thread Rod Taylor
> speak in the \copy command. I.e. you wouldn't use inserts to load your > data, you'd use a bulk copy, which bypassess all the serial / IDENTITY > stuff. Basically, with the IDENTITY type, if you try to insert a value, COPY enforces everything that insert does. It's simply a little quicker

Re: [DOCS] Need help with SGML again

2003-10-15 Thread Rod Taylor
> > Any thoughts on replacing Docbook with something else, someday? > > I don't see anything better arising. Neither do I, but our particular use of docbook is far from the easiest to work with. There are many tools which can give a nicer working environment for editing docbook based documents,

Re: [DOCS] Need help with SGML again

2003-10-15 Thread Rod Taylor
On Wed, 2003-10-15 at 12:29, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Rod Taylor writes: > > > Recently, I've been using Openoffice for a first cut and Conglomerate to > > clean the document up. Of course, that uses a strict XML version and I > > normally prefer xincludes to entit

Re: [DOCS] Need help with SGML again

2003-10-15 Thread Rod Taylor
On Wed, 2003-10-15 at 13:58, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Rod Taylor writes: > > > You don't need to switch toolkits to use XML input files as the source. > > Openjade and friends all support XML with the exception of xincludes > > (frankly, they're the best part)

Re: [DOCS] The Tutorial(TM)

2004-01-08 Thread Rod Taylor
On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 12:07, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > David Fetter wrote: > > Expanding on that, putting FK's in "Advanced Features" gives the (IME > > always wrong) impression that they're optional. > > They *are* optional. > > The first chapter is about getting the data in and out. That is no

Re: [DOCS] Suggestion on reorganizing functions

2004-08-09 Thread Rod Taylor
On Mon, 2004-08-09 at 16:39, Tom Lane wrote: > Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > One idea to solve it would to have the flat list link to > > functions-foo.html#FOOBAR - this would allow both methods of > > organization and only having function definitions in one spot. > > Basically what yo