On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 03:45:17PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of lun mar 07 15:16:31 -0300 2011:
>
> > If we do that then it becomes worth wondering what the -docs list is for
> > at all. Maybe we *should* get rid of it; I dunno. I see your point
> > about ho
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:35:41AM -0400, Greg Smith wrote:
> On 06/13/2011 09:36 AM, Rafael Martinez wrote:
> >It refers among other things to Inkscape [2]. This program generates SVG
> >diagrams and is not so difficult to use. One of the good things with
> >Inkscape is that it works with a standa
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 06:36:12PM +, Thom Brown wrote:
> On 13 June 2011 14:35, Greg Smith wrote:
> > I just created a drawing, saved it, then
> > modified it a bit. The spurious diff from the GUI was quite small: three
> > lines of junk with the filename change and some windowing metadata.
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 09:17:04PM +, Thom Brown wrote:
> >
> > xmllint --format for_test_here.svg | wc -l
>
> That restores some of the newlines, but inkscape seems to place tag
> attributes on their own separate lines for readability, so the outputs
> still differ, unless you pass both throu
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 08:59:41AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Robert Haas wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 8:46 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> > >
> > > Or at least, somebody passes it through the "proper editor" before
> > > committing. ?As long as said editor can read SVG output from a
> > > reasona
