t tried it on
earlier versions.
I think it would be helpful to note this somewhere on the Date/Time Types
page.
Chris
d Postgres feature. But why doesn't that page show up when
I do a search?
http://search.postgresql.org/search?u=/docs/9.0/static/&q=timestamptz
Chris
--
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/fuzzystrmatch.html
Description:
soundex/metaphone page:
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/fuzzystrmatch.html
It would be good to include that you need to install the
"Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Write news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Dan Langille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On 26 Aug 2003 at 9:14, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/sql-createdatabase.html
>
> > The value I see in those message is it gives the reader more
> > inf
I think it is a good idea.
Providing an example is better.
""Dan Langille"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Should we make some reference to ALTER TABLE on the the sequence
> page? A sequence owner is changed via:
>
> alter table forums_auth_id_seq owner to phorum;
>
> That's not
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Lane) writes:
> David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 04:30:40PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> If we're going to remove from the tutorial every feature for which
>>> any aspect is deemed by someone to be broken, the tutorial is liable
>>> to become
We're running into an issue with Slony-I documentation; I thought
there might be some wisdom possibly available here as the tools are
the same...
The Situation:
We're using Rod Taylor's "autodoc" package to generate documentation
for the database schema and the pl/pgsql functions
The Problem
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bruce Momjian) writes:
> With no new additions submitted today, I have moved my text into our
> SGML documentation:
>
> http://momjian.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/failover.html
>
> Please let me know what additional changes are needed.
It's looking a lot improved to me...
t...@sss.pgh.pa.us (Tom Lane) writes:
> Alvaro Herrera writes:
>> Excerpts from Peter Eisentraut's message of jue jul 01 21:52:00 -0400 2010:
>>> Is there something that makes installing dia more challenging than the
>>> other documentation build tools?
>
>> Err, I dunno -- it's just an apt-get aw
br...@momjian.us (Bruce Momjian) writes:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>> On Fri, 2 Jul 2010, Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>> > Alvaro Herrera writes:
>> >> Excerpts from Peter Eisentraut's message of jue jul 01 21:52:00 -0400
>> >> 2010:
>> >>> Is there something that makes installing dia more challenging th
pete...@gmx.net (Peter Eisentraut) writes:
> In general, I think the more efficient way to address this overall
> problem is to run the resulting HTML through tidy and be done with it.
+1. I use similar toolchain for my own web site, and one of the steps
is to run tidy on the output, which rectif
tion bar all the other pages seem to use.
Anyway, there's my feedback. Great documentation, but confusing navigation
makes it tough to use. Carry on... :)
Thanks!
Chris
--
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
On Feb 4, 2011, at 4:23 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I do like the chapter title there.
>
> Looking at "Home", we actually have two of them. The "Home" at the top
> left of the page links to the PG homepage, while the "Home" at the
> bottom goes to the top of the 9.0 documentation. That seems
be seen as misfeatures, such
as class.function syntax although this could be useful in the case of
simulating calculated fields. What do people think there? Is this a
feature or a misfeature?
Best Wishes,
Chris Travers
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 7:41 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Chris Travers writes:
> > I would like to contribute a "What is an Object Relational database?"
> > section to the documentation for 9.3. Where is the best place to start
> > tools and community-process-wise?
found that inherited relations do not inherit casts.
Is this intentional? Is there a reason I should be putting into the
documentation? Or is it just a gotcha that should be listed as a caveat?
Best Wishes,
Chris Travers
So here is a very rough draft. I would be interested in feedback as to
inaccuracies or omissions. I would like to get the technical side right
before going into an editorial phase.
Any feedback on the technical side?
Best Wishes,
Chris Travers
How is PostgreSQL "Object-Relational?"
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 8/15/12 5:33 AM, Chris Travers wrote:
>
>> So here is a very rough draft. I would be interested in feedback as to
>> inaccuracies or omissions. I would like to get the technical side right
>> before going
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Jeff Davis wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 16:03 -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > On 8/15/12 5:33 AM, Chris Travers wrote:
> > > So here is a very rough draft. I would be interested in feedback as to
> > > inaccuracies or omission
,
Chris Travers
s of
table inheritance? I personally recognize the difficulties in
documenting these but I can't help thinking that a simple chart of
"this is/is not inherited" would be very useful as well.
What do people think?
Best Wishes,
Chris Travers
--
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-doc
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 7:09 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Chris Travers writes:
>> 1) Would it be worth coming up with more useful examples for table
>> inheritance?
>> 2) Would it be worth adding mention of uses of multiple table inheritance?
>> 3) Would it be worth dis
As we move towards 9.4, would it be worthwhile suggesting that we break
this out into "Obsolete Versions" and "Forthcoming" or similar?
--
Best Wishes,
Chris Travers
Efficito: Hosted Accounting and ERP. Robust and Flexible. No vendor
lock-in.
http://www.efficito.com/learn_more.shtml
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/sql-set-constraints.html
Description:
We found that normally, if you execute SET TRANSACTION READ ONLY, it
prevents COMMIT from happening if any data has been changed in the
transa
should fix the number agreement problem with the replacement. Make site
administrator plural.
>
>
> --
> Álvaro Herrerahttps://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-docs ma
25 matches
Mail list logo
