Re: [DOCS] max_worker_processes default not documented

2016-08-02 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 5/12/16 9:24 AM, David G. Johnston wrote: > Thanks. Now for a related question. Are any of those workers > permanently in use? And what processes use them. I can think of > checkpoint writer and autovacuum off the top of my head that are > potential candidates. max_worker_processes only

[DOCS] max_worker_processes default not documented

2016-05-12 Thread David G. Johnston
On Thursday, May 12, 2016, Peter Eisentraut < peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com > wrote: > On 5/7/16 11:16 PM, David G. Johnston wrote: > >> While this may be in the postgresql.conf it's absence in the docs is made >> noticeable by

Re: [DOCS] max_worker_processes default not documented

2016-05-12 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 5/7/16 11:16 PM, David G. Johnston wrote: While this may be in the postgresql.conf it's absence in the docs is made noticeable by the fact both the immediately preceding and subsequent items in the 9.6 docs specify their default values. Furthermore, max_parallel_degree defaults to 2 but the

[DOCS] max_worker_processes default not documented

2016-05-07 Thread David G. Johnston
While this may be in the postgresql.conf it's absence in the docs is made noticeable by the fact both the immediately preceding and subsequent items in the 9.6 docs specify their default values. Furthermore, max_parallel_degree defaults to 2 but the workers come from the pool sized using