Re: gettext instructions for Windows seems wrong

2022-07-22 Thread Julien Rouhaud
Hi, On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 10:32:42AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 10:24:57AM +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: > > > On 17 Jan 2022, at 23:55, PG Doc comments form > > > wrote: > > > > > The instructions say that I have to edit config.pl (actually, I had to > > > create

Re: documentation on HOT

2022-07-22 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 10:02:18PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Sun, Feb 6, 2022 at 09:29:56PM -0500, Jonathan Katz wrote: > > I agree with Bruce's point that we should have a new section (or > > subsection). As I mentioned in my previous post, given HOT involves > > indexing, I would suggest

Re: Question about role attributes docs

2022-07-22 Thread Fujii Masao
On 2022/03/17 17:56, Shinya Kato wrote: Thank you for the review, and sorry for late reply. I fixed it. Thanks for updating the patch! I found that the patch has two trailing whitespaces. +A role can explicitly be restricted at time of creation from inheriting privileges of +

Re: gettext instructions for Windows seems wrong

2022-07-22 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 10:24:57AM +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: > > On 17 Jan 2022, at 23:55, PG Doc comments form > > wrote: > > > The instructions say that I have to edit config.pl (actually, I had to > > create it).. > > I know next to nothing about NLS on Windows, but regardless of doc

Re: documentation on HOT

2022-07-22 Thread Jonathan S. Katz
On 7/22/22 8:51 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote: On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 10:02:18PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: On Sun, Feb 6, 2022 at 09:29:56PM -0500, Jonathan Katz wrote: I agree with Bruce's point that we should have a new section (or subsection). As I mentioned in my previous post, given HOT

Re: documentation on HOT

2022-07-22 Thread David G. Johnston
On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 8:09 AM Jonathan S. Katz wrote: > On 7/22/22 8:51 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 10:02:18PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > >> On Sun, Feb 6, 2022 at 09:29:56PM -0500, Jonathan Katz wrote: > >>> I agree with Bruce's point that we should have a new

Re: documentation on HOT

2022-07-22 Thread Peter Geoghegan
On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 8:09 AM Jonathan S. Katz wrote: > Thanks! This is great. Probably the most concise and clear explanation I > have seen for HOT, which is exactly what we need for the docs :) I'm delighted that this is finally happening! > I think we should expand on this and explain how

Re: documentation on HOT

2022-07-22 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 09:25:43AM -0700, David G. Johnston wrote: > On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 8:09 AM Jonathan S. Katz wrote: > I think we need to expose the information regarding columns used in predicates > here. > > "(Here, "indexed column" means any column referenced > at all in an index

Re: documentation on HOT

2022-07-22 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 11:09:49AM -0400, Jonathan Katz wrote: > On 7/22/22 8:51 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > URL contents updated too: > > > > https://momjian.us/tmp/pgsql/storage-hot.html > > Thanks! This is great. Probably the most concise and clear explanation I > have seen for HOT,

Re: documentation on HOT

2022-07-22 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 01:07:41PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > You can increase the change of HOT updates by using non-default table > > fillfactor settings. > > > > I think we should expand on this and explain how adjusting "fillfactor" will > > affect this. I think that may change the

Re: documentation on HOT

2022-07-22 Thread Peter Geoghegan
On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 2:11 PM Bruce Momjian wrote: > I have improved the wording of the last paragraph in this patch. I think that it would be worth prominently explaining where heap-only tuples get their name from: it comes from the fact there are (by definition) no entries for a heap-only

Re: documentation on HOT

2022-07-22 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 10:05:04AM -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 8:09 AM Jonathan S. Katz wrote: > > Thanks! This is great. Probably the most concise and clear explanation I > > have seen for HOT, which is exactly what we need for the docs :) > > I'm delighted that this