Re: [DOCS] description of 'make world' in installation.sgml

2016-09-20 Thread Takeshi Ideriha
Hi, I'm sorry that somehow the patch was not attached in the previous mail. I'm trying again. Thank you, Takeshi Ideriha 2016-09-20 0:11 GMT+09:00 Takeshi Ideriha : > Hello, this is my first posting to the mailing list. > > It seems that the description of message displayed after running ‘make

Re: [DOCS] update to alter user mapping example

2016-09-20 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 8/24/16 9:07 PM, gabrielle wrote: > The example for ALTER USER MAPPING is missing the action keyword > (ADD|SET|DROP). > > Since ADD is the default option, the given command attempts to add a > user 'bob' to the already-existing user mapping 'bob', which throws an > 'ERROR: option "user" provi

Re: [DOCS] Obsolete warning on Python 2.4

2016-09-20 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 9/19/16 1:21 AM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > The docs say: >> Warning >> >> Due to Python bug #1483133, some debug versions of Python 2.4 >> (configured and compiled with option --with-pydebug) are known to >> crash the PostgreSQL server when using an iterator to return a set >> result. Unpatche

Re: [DOCS] Exclude constraints not shown ALTER TABLE documentation page

2016-09-20 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 9/19/16 9:42 AM, on...@citusdata.com wrote: > Though it is possible to add EXCLUDE CONSTRAINTs via ALTER TABLE as appears > here > http://thoughts.davisjeff.com/2010/09/25/exclusion-constraints-are-generalized-sql-unique/ > we could not see it on the related doc here > https://www.postgresql.org

Re: [DOCS] description of 'make world' in installation.sgml

2016-09-20 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 9/19/16 11:11 AM, Takeshi Ideriha wrote: > It seems that the description of message displayed after running ‘make > world’ is > different from the actual message echoed on a terminal. > > Actually, GNUmakefile.in says ‘~ documentation successfully made’ > but the documentation says ‘~ html do

Re: [DOCS] Obsolete warning on Python 2.4

2016-09-20 Thread Tom Lane
Peter Eisentraut writes: > On 9/19/16 1:21 AM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: >> That seems uninteresting to anyone in 2016. Any objections to removing it? > We're still maintaining compatibility with Python 2.4 and the bug > apparently still exists, so I would perhaps keep it until we kill > support