Hi,
On 2018-06-22 11:41:45 -0400, Adam Brusselback wrote:
> > Is there some way to make it auto-detect when it should be enabled? If
> not, please document that it should be used on ZFS and any other file
> system with CoW properties on files.
> In addition to this, wondering what type of
On 06/22/2018 09:50 AM, Moreno Andreo wrote:
Il 22/06/2018 15:18, Adrian Klaver ha scritto:
Are you sure that the entries where not encrypted with a different key
because I can't replicate.(More comments below):
(other replies below, inline)
I'm almost sure (you're never absolutely sure :-)
Il 22/06/2018 15:18, Adrian Klaver ha scritto:
On 06/22/2018 01:46 AM, Moreno Andreo wrote:
Il 21/06/2018 23:31, Adrian Klaver ha scritto:
On 06/21/2018 08:36 AM, Moreno Andreo wrote:
Hi,
while playing with pgcrypto I ran into a strange issue
(postgresql 9.5.3 x86 on Windows 7)
Having
> Is there some way to make it auto-detect when it should be enabled? If
not, please document that it should be used on ZFS and any other file
system with CoW properties on files.
In addition to this, wondering what type of performance regression this
would show on something like ext4 (if any).
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 1:35 PM, Jerry Jelinek
wrote:
> As Dave described in his original email on this topic, we'd like to avoid
> recycling WAL files since that can cause performance issues when we have a
> read-modify-write on a file that has dropped out of the cache.
>
> I have implemented a
Thomas,
Thanks for taking a look at this. I'll work on getting a patch together for
the master branch. I'll also take a look at the other question you raised
and get back to you once I have more information.
Thanks again,
Jerry
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 10:20 PM, Thomas Munro <
On 06/22/2018 01:46 AM, Moreno Andreo wrote:
Il 21/06/2018 23:31, Adrian Klaver ha scritto:
On 06/21/2018 08:36 AM, Moreno Andreo wrote:
Hi,
while playing with pgcrypto I ran into a strange issue
(postgresql 9.5.3 x86 on Windows 7)
Having a table with a field
dateofbirth text
I made
On 06/22/2018 01:12 AM, Łukasz Jarych wrote:
Hi Guys,
I want to create copies of tables in postgresql to use them by each user
in coherent way,
So version 1 will be schema1, version 2 will be schema2 (with copies of
tables from version 1).
How to perfom it ?
Using pg dump and creating new
Hello Tom, good evening.
Thank you for your prompt answer and help.
It was enough to ANALYZE the temp tables to achieve a magnificent
result: 37 seconds.
I'm portuguese.
It's a shame you live so far from me. So I can't put a box of bottles of
Porto wine at your door.
I also thank David
Hi Mike
Zitat von Mike Martin :
I have entries for files in database which lack specific values (xml files
not generated)
These values can be obtained by what are called DTC read files, where the
values are the same in the last DTC read file before date of file and the
next DTC read file (by
Hi
I am looking for suggestions about the best way to resolve this problem.
Scenario
I have entries for files in database which lack specific values (xml files
not generated)
These values can be obtained by what are called DTC read files, where the
values are the same in the last DTC read file
Il 21/06/2018 23:31, Adrian Klaver ha scritto:
On 06/21/2018 08:36 AM, Moreno Andreo wrote:
Hi,
while playing with pgcrypto I ran into a strange issue
(postgresql 9.5.3 x86 on Windows 7)
Having a table with a field
dateofbirth text
I made the following sequence of SQL commands
update
Hi Guys,
I want to create copies of tables in postgresql to use them by each user in
coherent way,
So version 1 will be schema1, version 2 will be schema2 (with copies of
tables from version 1).
How to perfom it ?
Using pg dump and creating new schemas (or databases is a better idea)?
Or it is
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 04:50:38PM -0700, David G. Johnston wrote:
> Generally only actual bug fixes get back-patched; but I'd have to say
> this looks like it could easily be classified as one.
Everybody is against me here ;)
> Some comments on the patch itself:
>
> "recover up to the wanted
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 04:42:00PM -0400, Ravi Krishna wrote:
> Same here even though I use Mac mail. But it is not yahoo alone.
> Most of the web email clients have resorted to top posting. I miss
> the old days of Outlook Express which was so '>' friendly. I think
> Gmail allows '>' when you
15 matches
Mail list logo
